|
中文文獻 Karl Larenz著,陳愛娥譯(1996),法學方法論,臺北:五南。[Larenz, Karl (1991), Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.]
王自雄(2010),人權兩公約之國內法化暨其施行法之實施,台灣法學雜誌,164期,頁113-122。
王泰升(2019),臺灣法律史的提出及學科化,中研院法學期刊,特刊,頁1-45。
王鵬翔、張永健(2011),經驗面向的規範意義—論實證研究在法學中的角色,中研院法學期刊,17期,頁205-294。
王騰坤、黃子庭(2006),全球化觀點與普世適用原則對加入世界衛生組織之探討:以台灣角度分析,研究台灣,創刊號,頁151-171。
丘宏達(2012),現代國際法,3版,臺北:三民。
江承軒(2013),台灣菸害治理機制的形成,國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
吳庚(2016),行政法之理論與實用,14版,臺北:自版。
吳信華(2011),憲法釋論,臺北:三民。
李建良(2014),論國際條約的國內法效力與法位階定序,收於:廖福特編,憲法解釋之理論與實務,頁175-275,臺北:中央研究院法律學研究所。
周桂田(2014),風險社會典範轉移,臺北:遠流。
林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元、張文貞(2005),憲法——權力分立,臺北:新學林。
林育生(2007),我國非營利組織在立法過程中的議題倡導策略—以董氏基金會推動「菸害防制法」修訂為例,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
林明昕(2016),基本國策之規範效力及其對社會正義之影響,臺大法學論叢,45卷特刊,頁1305-1358。
法治斌、董保城(2010),憲法新論,4版,臺北:自版。
姜皇池(2007),以台灣名義申請加入聯合國之法律意義,新世紀智庫論壇,第39期,頁18-32。
徐揮彥(2014),「公民與政治權利國際公約」與「經濟、社會與文化權利國際公約」在我國最高法院與最高行政法院適用之研究,臺大法學論叢,43卷特刊,頁839-909。
高聖惕(2013),臺灣與世界衛生組織:我國參與世界衛生組織幾個重要會議與機制的法律可行性評估,政大法學論叢,133期,頁133-224。
張文貞(2009),憲法與國際人權法的匯流—兼論我國大法官解釋之實踐,收於:廖福特編,憲法解釋之理論與實務,頁223-272。
莊智婷(2007),利益團體立法遊說之研究:以菸害防制法修正案為例,銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士論文。
許育典(2010),憲法,4版,臺北:元照。
陳怡凱(2015),國際人權法在我國法院之適用—以精障者是否可科處死刑為例,憲政時代,第40卷,第3期,頁311-359。
陳牧民(2010),主權理論與當前臺灣外交戰略,全球政治評論,31期,頁105-124。
陳春生(2003),憲法,臺北:自版。
陳敏(2002),行政法總論,2版,臺北:自版。
彭明敏、黄昭堂著,蔡秋雄譯(1995),台灣在國際法上的地位,臺北:玉山社。[彭明敏、黄昭堂(1976),台湾の法的地位,東京:東京大学出版会。]
黃昭元(2010),臺灣法律發展回顧—憲法,臺大法學論叢,第39卷,第2期,頁5-30。
黃異(2006),國際法在國內法領域中的效力,臺北:元照。
黃舒芃(2016),國際及區域人權公約在憲法解釋中扮演的角色,臺灣民主季刊,第13卷,第1期,頁85-129。
葉俊榮編(2014),轉型中的東亞法院:基本形貌、紛爭解決與行政治理,臺北:臺大出版中心。
———(2015),氣候變遷治理與法律,臺北:臺大出版中心。
———編(2016),變遷中的東亞法院:從指標性判決看東亞法院的角色與功能,臺北:臺大出版中心。
裘兆琳(2010),我國參與世界衛生組織之策略演變與美國角色分析:一九九七~二○○九,歐美研究,40卷2期,頁431-571。
詹鎮榮(2006),總統對「違憲法律」之拒絕公布權?,月旦法學教室,第46期,頁8-9。 蔡韻竹、蔡憶文(2015),我國菸害防制政策制定的政治分析,台灣公共衛生雜誌,34卷5期,頁447-462。
鄧玉珊(2015),從「敬菸」到「禁菸」—論臺灣反菸政治/1960-2012,東海大學社會學系碩士論文。
鄭端耀(1998),務實外交的發展與抉擇,問題與研究,37卷4期,頁1-20。
羅承宗(2009),將錯就錯的總統?——再訪總統拒絕公布法律權,台灣法學雜誌,137期,頁21-30。
羅金棟(2007),國家治理中非政府組織的角色與政策倡議策略:以菸害防制法為例,非政府組織學刊,2期,頁69-90。
蘇永欽(2002),法律案跨屆覆議的憲法問題,法令月刊,第53卷,第2期,頁3-12。
外文文獻 Abbott, Kenneth W. 2006. Toward a Richer Institutionalism for International Law and Policy. Journal of International Law and International Relations 1: 9-34.
Adler, Emanuel. 2002. Constructivism and International Relations. Pp. 95-118 in The Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE.
Baldwin, David A. 2002. Power and International Relations. Pp. 177-191 in The Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE.
Baldwin, Robert, and Martin Cave. 2012. Understanding Regulation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Black, Julia. 1997. Rules and Regulators. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brewster, Rachel. 2009. Unpacking the State's Reputation. Harvard International Law Journal 50:231-269.
Bronwen, Morgan, and Karen Yeung. 2007. An Introduction to Law and Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brownlie, Ian. 2008. Principle of Public International Law. 7th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cairney, Paul, Donley T. Studlar, and Hadii M. Mamuda. 2012. Global Tobacco Control: Power, Policy, Governance and Transfer. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Calabresi, Guido. 2003. An Introduction to Legal Thought: Four Approaches to Law and to the Allocation of Body Parts. Stanford Law Review 55: 2113-2151.
Chayes, Abram, and Antonia Handler Chayes. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47: 175-205.
Chen, Lung-chu, and W. Michael Reisman. 1972. Who Owns Taiwan: A Search for International Title. Yale Law Journal: 81: 599-671.
Chen, Lung-chu. 2016. The U.S.-Taiwan-China Relationship in International Law and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, Yu-Jie. 2019. Isolated but Not Oblivious: Taiwan’s Acceptance of the Two Major Human Rights Covenants. Pp. 207-225 in Taiwan and International Human Rights: A Story of Transformation, edited by Jerome A. Cohen, William P. Alford, and Chang-fa Lo. Singapore: Springer.
Chung, Ho-Yi, Shu-Ying Lo, Yu-Juan Liu, Mei-Chu Lin, Li-Hui Yu, Ying-Wei Wang, and Yi-Ren Wang. 2018. Assessment of 2016 Taiwan Tobacco Control Performance Based on WHO MPOWER Guidelines. Tobacco Induced Disease 16:11.
Cooper, Rusell W. 1999. Coordination Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crawford, James. 2007. The Creation of States in International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
───. 2012. Brownlie’s Principle of Public International Law. 8th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Croley, Steven P. 1998. Theories of Regulation: Incorporating the Administrative Process. Columbia Law Review 98: 1-168.
Daintith, Terence. 1994. The Techniques of government. Pp. 209-246 in The Changing Constitution, 3rd ed., edited by Jeffrey L. Jowell and Dawn Oliver. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
DeLand, Katherine, Gemma Lien, and Heather Wipfli. 2014. The WHO FCTC and the Tobacco Free Initiative. Pp. 11-31 in The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law, edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Fearon, James, and Alexander Wendt. 2002. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. Pp. 73-94 in The Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE.
Goldsmith, Jack, and Eric Posner. 2005. The Limit of International Law. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Gostin, Lawrence O. 2014. Global Health Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gunningham, Neil, and Darren Sinclair. 2017. Smart Regulation. Pp. 133-148 in Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, edited by Peter Drahos. Acton: ANU Press.
Guzman, Andrew T. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
───. 2002. A Compliance-Based Theory of International Law. California Law Review 90: 1823-1887.
Guzzini, Stefano. 2000. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 6(2): 147-182.
Halabi Sam Foster. 2010. The World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: An Analysis of Guidelines Adopted by the Conference of the Parties. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 39:121-183.
Halliday, Terence C., and Bruce Carruthers. 2007. The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm Making and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes. American Journal of Sociology 112: 1135-1202.
Halliday, Terence C., and Gregory Shaffer. 2015. Researching Transnational Legal Orders. Pp. 475-528 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Terence C. Halliday and Gregory Shaffer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
───. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. Pp. 3-72 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Terence C. Halliday and Gregory Shaffer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie. 1996. The International Status of Taiwan in the New World Order: Legal and Political Considerations. London: Kluwer Law International.
Henkin, Louis. 1979. How Nations Behave. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Published for the Council on Foreign Relations by Columbia University Press.
Hood, Christopher, Henry Rothstein, and Robert Baldwin. 2001. The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Jessup, Philip. 1956. Transnational Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Koh, Harold Hongju. 1996. Transnational Legal Process. Nebraska Law Review 75: 181-207.
───. 1999. How is International Human Rights Law Enforced? Indiana Law Journal 74: 1397-1417.
───. 2004. International Law as Part of Our Law. American Journal of International Law 98: 43-57.
───. 2005. Internalization through Socialization. Duke Law Journal 54: 975-982.
───. 2006. Why Transnational Law Matters. Penn State International Law Review 24: 745-753.
Krueger, Anne O. 1974. The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. The American Economic Review 64: 291-303.
Liberman, Johnathan. 2014. The Power of the WHO FCTC: Understanding its Legal Status and weight. Pp. 48-63 in The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law, edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lin, Ching-Fu. 2017. Toward a More Rounded Strategy to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products. Journal of World Trade 51(2): 265-284.
Lo, Chang-fa. 2014. Guidelines and Protocols under the Framework Convention. Pp. 32-47 in The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law, edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
May, Peter J. 2007. Regulatory Regimes and Accountability. Regulation and Governance 1:8-26.
Murphy, Kristina, Tom R. Tyler, and Amy Curtis. 2009. Nurturing Regulatory Compliance: Is Procedural Justice Effective When People Question the Legitimacy of the Law? Regulation and Governance 3:1-26.
Oeter, Stefan. 2008. Toward a Richer Institutionalism for International Law and Policy-A Comment on Kenneth Abbott's Recent Work. University of Illinois Law Review 2008: 61-70.
Ogus, Anthony. 1995. Rethinking Self-Regulation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15: 97-108. Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich. 1996. Constitutionalism and International Organizations, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business. 17: 398-469.
───. 2007. Multilevel Judicial Governance of International Trade Requires a Common Conception of Rule of Law and Justice. Journal of International Economic Law 10(3): 529-551.
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization 42: 427-460.
Raustiala, Kal, and Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2002. International law, International Relations and Compliance. Pp. 538-558 in The Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons. London: SAGE.
Roth, Brad R. 2009. The Entity that Dare Not Speak Its Name: Unrecognized Taiwan as a Right-Bearer in the International Legal Order. East Asia Law Review 4: 91-124.
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2013. Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’. Political Studies 61: 2-22.
Schmidt, Vivien A., and Matthew Wood. 2019. Conceptualizing Throughput Legitimacy: Procedural Mechanisms of Accountability, Transparency, Inclusiveness and Openness in EU Governance. Public Administration 97: 727-740.
Scott, Colin. 2000. Accountability in the Regulatory State. Journal of Law and Society 27: 38-60.
Shaffer, Gregory C. 2012. Transnational Legal Process and State Change. Law and Social Inquiry 37: 229-264.
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Terence C. Halliday. 2016. With, Within, and Beyond the State: The Promise and Limits of Transnational Legal Ordering. Research Paper No. 2016-59, UC Irvine School of Law. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2882851.
Scharpf, Fritz W. 2003. Problem-Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU. Working Paper 03/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Available at https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/41664/1/639580440.pdf.
Shaw, Malcolm N. 2014. International Law. 7th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shelton, Dinah. 2011. Introduction. Pp. 1-22 in International Law and Domestic Legal Systems, Incorporation, Transformation, and Persuasion, edited by Dinah Shelton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Andrew S. Tulumello, and Stepan Wood. 1998. International Law and International Relations Theory: A New Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship. The American Journal of International Law 92: 367-397.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Steinitz, Maya. 2013. Transnational Legal Process Theories. Pp. 339-356 in Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, edited by Cesare P. R. Romano, Karen J. Alter, and Yuval Shany. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. After the Rights Revolution: Reconceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wu, Chuan-Feng. 2014. Tobacco Control in Taiwan. Pp. 279-301 in The Global Tobacco Epidemic and the Law, edited by Andrew D. Mitchell and Tania Voon. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. |