帳號:guest(3.145.95.133)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):易莉翔
作者(外文):Yi, Li-Hsiang
論文名稱(中文):創新如何促進商業生態系統的永續發展:以台灣漫畫產業為例
論文名稱(外文):How innovation contributes to the sustainable business ecosystem: A lesson from the Taiwanese local comic industry
指導教授(中文):謝英哲
指導教授(外文):Hsieh, Ying-Che
口試委員(中文):翁晶晶
李憶萱
口試委員(外文):Weng, Jing-Jing
Lee, Yi-Hsuan
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:科技管理研究所
學號:105073516
出版年(民國):107
畢業學年度:106
語文別:英文
論文頁數:35
中文關鍵詞:創新生態系統商業生態系統開放式創新台灣文創產業
外文關鍵詞:Innovation ecosystemBusiness ecosystemOpen innovationCultural and creative industryTaiwan
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:264
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:97
  • 收藏收藏:0
自從Moore (1993) 首次提出商業生態系統理論的雛形後,多元的商業生態系統理論自此傾巢而出。目前的學術研究多將商業生態系統的理論應用於特定場域的研究,比如高科技產業(Adner, 2016);然而,很少研究會著墨於非科技產業的生態系統研究。本研究採取案例分析的研究方法,透過研究台灣本土漫畫產業中的兩大出版社巨頭,來了解有哪些創新機制可以協助文化創意產業中的商業生態系統持續發展;以及在這樣的生態系統中有哪些異業合作的模式可以為既有廠商帶來可觀效益,並且延續其發展性。本研究具體描繪這兩家出版業者的培育漫畫家機制,而透過這些創新機制,出版業者得以發展明星漫畫作品,並透過明星漫畫作品的爆發來刺激漫畫市場的消費力,最後帶來文創產業價值的延續和再造。
Since Moore (1993) has first proposed the concept of business ecosystem, several streams of ecosystem theory have been carried out. Existing literature has applied ecosystem theory to specific industry fields like high-tech industry (Adner, 2016), but few research has been focus on other industry field, such as cultural and creative industry. Take a case study approach of two focal firms, this study aims to investigate how innovation contributes to the incubating process of an ecosystem by revealing the key factors necessary to sustain the health of an innovation ecosystem in a cultural and creative industry, and what the feature of the potential focal firms is to give out efficient vertical or horizontal alliance throughout different industry fields. Our findings provide further depiction in constructing a mechanism of nurturing professional artists to elevate the product’s quality. By creating a popular and high-quality work, the market demand will increase, which also initiate a potential upsurge of cultural and creative industry.
Table of contents 7
List of Figures………………………………………………………………………………….7
List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………………...7
1. Introduction 8
2. Literature Review 11
2.1 Business Ecosystem………………………………………………………………..11
2.2 Various Stream of Ecosystem………………………………………………………12
2.3 BELC Lifecycle of business Ecosystem……………………………………………13
2.4 A Merge Concept of Innovation and Platform Ecosystem………………………….14
2.5 Research Gap Identified…………………………………………………………....14
3. Methodology 15
3.1 Research Approach………………………………………………………………...15
3.2 Data Collection and Analysis………………………………………………………16
4. Discussion……………………………………………………………………………….16
4.1 Current Taiwanese comic ecosystem……………………………………………….16
4.2 Difficulties of developing local comics…………………………………………….20
4.3 The focal firm of local ecosystem…………………………………………………..22
4.4 International ecosystem development……………………………………………...26
4.5 Innovation involved in the development of ecosystem……………………………..27
4.6 Motivation to build up an innovation ecosystem…………………………………...29
5. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………30
Reference……………………………………………………………………………………..31
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 625-648
Agarwal, R., & Bayus, B. L. (2002). The market evolution and sales takeoff of product innovations. Management Science, 48(8), 1024-1041.
Afuah, A. (2000). How Much Do Your" Co-Opetitors'" Capabilities Matter in the Face of Technological Change?. Strategic Management Journal, 387-404.
Bass, F. M. (2004). Comments on “a new product growth for model consumer durables the bass model”. Management science, 50(12_supplement), 1833-1840.
Bosch-Sijtsema, P. M., & Bosch, J. (2015). Plays nice with others? Multiple ecosystems, various roles and divergent engagement models. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(8), 960-974.
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). 'Mode 3'and'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201-234.
Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2011). Co-creation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software.
Chen, C. W. (2011). The social foundation and demand of cultural industry: A comparative study on manga industries in Taiwan and Japan. Journal for Studies of Everyday Life, 3, 1-39.
Cusumano, M. (2010). Technology strategy and management: The evolution of platform thinking. Communications of the ACM, 53(1), 32-34.
De Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2016). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic management journal, 1105-1121.
Fetters, M., Greene, P. G., & Rice, M. P.(Eds.). (2010). The development of university-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: Global practices. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan management review, 49(2), 28.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Press.
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: what the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Press.
Iansiti, M., & Richards, G. L. (2006). The information technology ecosystem: Structure, health, and performance. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51(1), 77-110.
Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Institute of International European Affairs, Dublin, Ireland.
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 274-296.
Kapoor, R., & Furr, N. R. (2015). Complementarities and competition: Unpacking the drivers of entrants' technology choices in the solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management Journal, 36(3), 416-436.
King, A. A., & Tucci, C. L. (2002). Incumbent entry into new market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management science, 48(2), 171-186.
Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Parker, G. G., & Harding, D. J. (2002). Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies: Lidar, an emerging remote sensing technology that directly measures the three-dimensional distribution of plant canopies, can accurately estimate vegetation structural attributes and should be of particular interest to forest, landscape, and global ecologists. BioScience, 52(1), 19-30.
Li, Y. R. (2009). The technological roadmap of Cisco's business ecosystem. Technovation, 29 (5), 379-386.
Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-83.
Moore, J. F. (1997). The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Harper Paperbacks.
Nalebuff, B. J., & Brandenburger, A. M. (1997). Co-opetition: Competitive and cooperative business strategies for the digital economy. Strategy & leadership, 25(6), 28-33.
Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in Innovation Ecosystems: Entrepreneurs' Self‐Regulatory Processes and Their Implications for New Venture Success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071-1097.
Pierce, L. (2009). Big losses in ecosystem niches: How core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management Journal, 30(3), 323-347.
Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage– How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&d Management, 39(4), 420-430.
Taylor, A. (2010). The next generation: Technology adoption and integration through internal competition in new product development. Organization Science, 21(1), 23-41.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 509-533.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Research commentary—Platform Evolution, Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675-687.
Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Cano Giner, J. L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195-1215.
Yu, Y. L. (2012). The strategy plan of promotion the comics industry in Taiwan by the consumer awareness (sic). Journal of Arts, 1, 82-100
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *