本文旨在描述普通話量化標記「各自」的語意特性。在前人研究當中，這一量化標記被認為是分指標記（distributive marker）並引發「分指解釋」（distributive reading）。例如，普通話「這九位調音師各自修理了一台鋼琴」當且僅當「每一位調音師都修理了一台鋼琴」時為真。然而，在本文中，我提出「各自」還存在另一種「一一對應解釋」（one-on-one branching reading）。例如，普通話「這九位調音師各自修理了九台鋼琴」可以表達「一共有九台鋼琴，每一位調音師都修理了其中一台鋼琴」的情景。此前的研究對上述情況鮮有提
及。

本文的理論貢獻即是對「各自」的「分指」用法和「一一對應」用法進行整合分析。我延用了Hsieh (2019) 對另一普通話量化副詞「各」的分析，他的分析基於Kratzer （2008）的事件語意學，Cable (2014) 以及Balusu (2006) 的「事件隔斷」（event partition）理論。此外，我還結合了Eckardt (2001) 對於德語「selbst」的分析，分析認為作為狀語的「selbst」表示為「本身函數」（identity function）並且始終為焦點（focus）。上述分析綜合起來構成了「各自」的語意貢獻。

The goal of this thesis is to provide a proper characterization of the semantic contribution of the quantificational adverb gezi in Mandarin. In the previous research, this quantificational adverb has been taken to be a distributive marker and gives rise to a so-called ‘distributive reading’; for instance, the Mandarin counterpart of these nine tuners gezi repaired one pianos is true iff each of the tuners repaired one piano. Nevertheless, in this thesis, I report that there are some cases in which gezi gives rise to a one-on-one branching reading; for instance, the Mandarin counterpart of these nine tuners gezi repaired these nine pianos may be uttered to report a scenario in which each of the 9 tuners repaired one piano, and therefore there are 9 pianos repaired in total. The view from the previous research, as I show in this thesis, fails to account for the
use of gezi in such cases.

The theoretical contribution of this thesis hence is a uniform analysis of the distributive use and the one-to-one branching use of gezi. I extend Hsieh’s (2019) analysis for another Mandarin quantificationa adverb ge, which is built on the event semantics in Kratzer (2008) and Cable (2014) and the idea of ‘event partition’ suggested by Balusu (2006). This analysis, together with Eckardt’s (2001) idea on German selbst, according to which selbst with its adverbial use denotes the identity function and is always in focus, fully characterizes the semantic contribution of gezi.

1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
2 Literature Review on Ge and Gezi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
2.1 Previous Research on Syntax of Ge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
2.2 Previous Research on Semantics of Ge . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
2.3 Previous Analysis for Gezi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11
3 Theoretical Assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
3.1 Hsieh (2019)’s Analysis on Mandarin Ge . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.1.1 Basic Assumption . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.1.2 Cable (2014)’s Binary Maximality Operator . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.1.3 Balusu (2006)’s Partitions on Events . . . . . . . .. . . . . 37
4 The Semantics of Gezi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.1 The Semantic Description of Gezi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.2 The Semantics of Zi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.3 Proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5 The Prediction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60
6 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78

Balusu, R. (2006). Distributive reduplication in telegu. In Proceedings-nels (Vol. 36, p. 39).
Barker, C. (2007). Parasitic scope. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(4), 407–444.
Beck, S., & von Stechow, A. (2007). Pluractional adverbials. J. Semantics, 24, 215-254.
Cable, S. (2014). Distributive numerals and distance distributivity in tlingit (and beyond). Language, 90(3), 562–606.
Champollion, L. (2015). The interaction of compositional semantics and event semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(1), 31–66.
Champollion, L. (2016a). Covert distributivity in algebraic event semantics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 9, 15–1.
Champollion, L. (2016b, 6). Overt distributivity in algebraic event semantics. Semantics and Pragmatics, 9(16), 1–65. doi: 10.3765/sp.9.16
Chao, Y. R. (1965). A grammar of spoken chinese.
Eckardt, R. (2001). Reanalysing selbst. Natural language semantics, 9(4), 371–412.
Hacquard, V. (2009). On the interaction of aspect and modal auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy, 32(3), 279–315.
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UMass Amherst.
Hsieh, I.-T. C. (2019). A note on some distributive markers in mandarin.
Huang, C.-T. J. (2002). Distributivity and reflexivity. Tang, S.-W. & Luther, C.-S.(2002),(eds.), On the Formal Way to Chinese Language, 21–44.
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 109–137). Springer.
Kratzer, A. (2008). On the plurality of verbs. Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, 269–300.
Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives (Vol. 36). Oxford University Press.
Kratzer, A., & Heim, I. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar (Vol. 1185). Blackwell Oxford.
Krifka, M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitutionm in sag i & szabolcsi a (eds.), lexical matters. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
LaTerza, C. (2014). Local plural anaphora as sub-event distributivity. In Presentation at the nd west coast conference on formal linguistics (wccfl).
Lee, P. P., Zhang, L., & Pan, H. (2009). The distributive operator ge and some related issues. Language and Linguistics, 10(2), 293–314.
Li, H., & Law, J. H.-K. (2015). At least some distributive items aren’t distributive items. Proceedins of the Forty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 2, 269–278.
Li, X. (1997). Deriving distributivity in mandarin chinese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine.
Lin, S.-Y. J. (2010). On reflexivity and reflexive predicate in mandarin chinese. Master’s thesis, 1–109.
Lin, T.-H. J. (1998). On ge and other related problems. , 209–253.
Lin, T.-H. J. (2004). Aspect, distributivity, and wh/qp interaction in chinese. Language and Linguistics, 5(3), 615–642.
Lin, T.-H. J. (2005). Notes on the determiner ge and related problems. UST Working Papers in Linguistics, Graduate Institute of Linguistics, 1(National Tsing Hua University).
Link, G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. Formal semantics: The essential readings, 127–146.
Link, G. (1987). Generalized quantifiers and plurals. In Generalized quantifiers (pp. 151–180). Springer.
Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Introducing arguments (Vol. 49). MIT press.
Rooth, M. (1985). Association focus. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, os-8.
Rooth, M. (1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75-116.
Scha, R. J. (1984). Distributive, collective and cumulative quantification. In Truth, interpretation and information; selected papers from the 3rd amsterdam colloquium, dordrecht, holland (pp. 131–158).
Schwarzschild, R. (1996). Pluralities (Vol. 61). Springer Science & Business Media.
Silk, A. (2018). Weak and strong necessity modals. Meaning, decision, and norms: Themes from the work of Allan Gibbard.
Soh, H.-L. (2005). Mandarin distributive quantifier ge‘each’, the structures of double complement constructions and the verb–preposition distinction. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 14(2), 155–173.
Tsai, W.-T. D. (2017). Self and only: A comparative study of reflexive adverbials in squliq atayal and mandarin chinese. In Perspectives on the architecture and acquisition of syntax (pp. 149–170). Springer.
Winter, Y. (2000). Distributivity and dependency. Natural language semantics, 8(1),27–69.
Yang, T.-H. (2012). Distributivity in mandarin chinese. Master’s thesis, 1–93.