|
References 1. Alam, H.B., et al., Hemorrhage control in the battlefield: Role of new hemostatic agents. Military Medicine, 2005. 170(1): p. 63-69. 2. Lundblad, R.L., et al., A review of the therapeutic uses of thrombin. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2004. 91(5): p. 851-860. 3. Levy, J.H., et al., Multidisciplinary Approach to the Challenge of Hemostasis. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 2010. 110(2): p. 354-364. 4. Mackman, N., R.E. Tilley, and N.S. Key, Role of the extrinsic pathway of blood coagulation in hemostasis and thrombosis. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 2007. 27(8): p. 1687-1693. 5. Gale, A.J., Continuing Education Course #2: Current Understanding of Hemostasis. Toxicologic Pathology, 2011. 39(1): p. 273-280. 6. Pisano, J.J., J.S. Finlayson, and M.P. Peyton, Cross-Link in Fibrin Polymerized by Factor 13 Epsilon-(Gamma-Glutamyl Lysine. Science, 1968. 160(3830): p. 892-893. 7. Samudrala, S., Topical hemostatic agents in surgery: a surgeon's perspective. Aorn j, 2008. 88(3): p. S2-11. 8. Song, H., L.L. Zhang, and X.J. Zhao, Hemostatic Efficacy of Biological Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofibers in a Rat Kidney Model. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2010. 10(1): p. 33-39. 9. Ellis-Behnke, R.G., et al., Nano hemostat solution: immediate hemostasis at the nanoscale. Nanomedicine-Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine, 2006. 2(4): p. 207-215. 10. Achneck, H.E., et al., A Comprehensive Review of Topical Hemostatic Agents Efficacy and Recommendations for Use. Annals of Surgery, 2010. 251(2): p. 217-228. 11. Rouwkema, J. and A. Khademhosseini, Vascularization and Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Beyond Creating Static Networks. Trends in Biotechnology, 2016. 34(9): p. 733-745. 12. Colton, C.K., Implantable biohybrid artificial organs. Cell Transplantation, 1995. 4(4): p. 415-436. 13. Go, A.S., et al., Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 2014. 129(3): p. e28-e292. 14. Fife, C.E. and M.J. Carter, Wound Care Outcomes and Associated Cost Among Patients Treated in US Outpatient Wound Centers: Data From the US Wound Registry. Wounds, 2012. 24(1): p. 1-10. 15. Carmeliet, P. and R.K. Jain, Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature, 2011. 473(7347): p. 298-307. 16. Bae, H., et al., Building Vascular Networks. Science Translational Medicine, 2012. 4(160). 17. Byrne, A.M., D.J. Bouchier-Hayes, and J.H. Harmey, Angiogenic and cell survival functions of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2005. 9(4): p. 777-794. 18. Ferrara, N., H.P. Gerber, and J. LeCouter, The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nature Medicine, 2003. 9(6): p. 669-676. 19. Macri, L., D. Silverstein, and R.A.F. Clark, Growth factor binding to the pericellular matrix and its importance in tissue engineering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2007. 59(13): p. 1366-1381. 20. Nakamura, T. and S. Mizuno, The discovery of Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) and its significance for cell biology, life sciences and clinical medicine. Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B-Physical and Biological Sciences, 2010. 86(6): p. 588-610. 21. Higashi, Y. and T. Murohara, Therapeutic Angiogenesis. 2017: Springer. 22. Richardson, T.P., et al., Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery. Nature Biotechnology, 2001. 19: p. 1029. 23. Xin, X.H., et al., Hepatocyte growth factor enhances vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. American Journal of Pathology, 2001. 158(3): p. 1111-1120. 24. Eming, S.A., P. Martin, and M. Tomic-Canic, Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Science Translational Medicine, 2014. 6(265). 25. Das, S., M. Majid, and A.B. Baker, Syndecan-4 enhances PDGF-BB activity in diabetic wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia, 2016. 42: p. 56-65. 26. Van Hove, A.H. and D.S.W. Benoit, Depot-Based Delivery Systems for Pro-Angiogenic Peptides: A Review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2015. 3(102). 27. Whitesides, G.M. and B. Grzybowski, Self-assembly at all scales. Science, 2002. 295(5564): p. 2418-2421. 28. Nasalean, L., et al., Controlling RNA self-assembly to form filaments. Nucleic Acids Research, 2006. 34(5): p. 1381-1392. 29. Semino, C.E., Self-assembling peptides: From bio-inspired materials to bone regeneration. Journal of Dental Research, 2008. 87(7): p. 606-616. 30. Lutolf, M.P. and J.A. Hubbell, Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nature Biotechnology, 2005. 23(1): p. 47-55. 31. Zhang, S.G., et al., Spontaneous assembly of a self-complementary oligopeptide to form a stable macroscopic membrane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1993. 90(8): p. 3334-3338. 32. Loo, Y., S.G. Zhang, and C.A.E. Hauser, From short peptides to nanofibers to macromolecular assemblies in biomedicine. Biotechnology Advances, 2012. 30(3): p. 593-603. 33. Hauser, C.A.E. and S.G. Zhang, Designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber biological materials. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010. 39(8): p. 2780-2790. 34. Nagarkar, R.P., et al., De novo design of strand-swapped beta-hairpin hydrogels. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2008. 130(13): p. 4466-4474. 35. Worthington, P., S. Langhans, and D. Pochan, beta-hairpin peptide hydrogels for package delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2017. 110: p. 127-136. 36. Woolfson, D.N. and Z.N. Mahmoud, More than just bare scaffolds: towards multi-component and decorated fibrous biomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews, 2010. 39(9): p. 3464-3479. 37. Hauser, C.A.E., et al., Natural tri- to hexapeptides self-assemble in water to amyloid beta-type fiber aggregates by unexpected alpha-helical intermediate structures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. 108(4): p. 1361-1366. 38. Khoe, U., Y.L. Yang, and S.G. Zhang, Synergistic Effect and Hierarchical Nanostructure Formation in Mixing Two Designer Lipid-Like Peptide Surfactants Ac-A(6)D-OH and Ac-A(6)K-NH2. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2008. 8(11): p. 1060-1067. 39. Dasgupta, A., J.H. Mondal, and D. Das, Peptide hydrogels. RSC Advances, 2013. 3(24): p. 9117-9149. 40. Moore, A.N. and J.D. Hartgerink, Self-Assembling Multidomain Peptide Nanofibers for Delivery of Bioactive Molecules and Tissue Regeneration. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2017. 50(4): p. 714-722. 41. da Silva, R.M.P., et al., Super-resolution microscopy reveals structural diversity in molecular exchange among peptide amphiphile nanofibres. Nature Communications, 2016. 7. 42. Yu, G.C., K.C. Jie, and F.H. Huang, Supramolecular Amphiphiles Based on Host-Guest Molecular Recognition Motifs. Chemical Reviews, 2015. 115(15): p. 7240-7303. 43. Hartgerink, J.D., E. Beniash, and S.I. Stupp, Self-assembly and mineralization of peptide-amphiphile nanofibers. Science, 2001. 294(5547): p. 1684-1688. 44. Shi, J.F., et al., Exceptionally small supramolecular hydrogelators based on aromatic-aromatic interactions. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2011. 7: p. 167-172. 45. Gao, J., et al., Enzyme Promotes the Hydrogelation from a Hydrophobic Small Molecule. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2009. 131(32): p. 11286-+. 46. Gelain, F., A. Horii, and S.G. Zhang, Designer self-assembling peptide scaffolds for 3-D tissue cell cultures and regenerative medicine. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2007. 7(5): p. 544-551. 47. Koutsopoulos, S., Self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogels in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: Progress, design guidelines, and applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2016. 104(4): p. 1002-1016. 48. Cheng, T.Y., et al., Self-assembling functionalized nanopeptides for immediate hemostasis and accelerative liver tissue regeneration. Nanoscale, 2013. 5(7): p. 2734-2744. 49. Waku, T. and N. Tanaka, Recent advances in nanofibrous assemblies based on -sheet-forming peptides for biomedical applications. Polymer International, 2017. 66(2): p. 277-288. 50. Ellis-Behnke, R.G., et al., Nano neuro knitting: Peptide nanofiber scaffold for brain repair and axon regeneration with functional return of vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. 103(13): p. 5054-5059. 51. Davis, M.E., et al., Injectable self-assembling peptide nanofibers create intramyocardial microenvironments for endothelial cells. Circulation, 2005. 111(4): p. 442-450. 52. Cheng, T.Y., et al., Neural stem cells encapsulated in a functionalized self-assembling peptide hydrogel for brain tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2013. 34(8): p. 2005-2016. 53. Taraballi, F., et al., Glycine-spacers influence functional motifs exposure and self-assembling propensity of functionalized substrates tailored for neural stem cell cultures. Frontiers in Neuroengineering, 2010. 3(1). 54. Kumada, Y. and S.G. Zhang, Significant Type I and Type III Collagen Production from Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts in 3D Peptide Scaffolds without Extra Growth Factors. Plos One, 2010. 5(4). 55. Wang, X.M., A. Horii, and S.G. Zhang, Designer functionalized self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds for growth, migration, and tubulogenesis of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Soft Matter, 2008. 4(12): p. 2388-2395. 56. Maude, S., E. Ingham, and A. Aggeli, Biomimetic self-assembling peptides as scaffolds for soft tissue engineering. Nanomedicine, 2013. 8(5): p. 823-847. 57. Pugliese, R. and F. Gelain, Peptidic Biomaterials: From Self-Assembling to Regenerative Medicine. Trends in Biotechnology, 2017. 35(2): p. 145-158. 58. Eskandari, S., et al., Recent advances in self-assembled peptides: Implications for targeted drug delivery and vaccine engineering. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2017. 110: p. 169-187. 59. Worthington, P., S. Langhans, and D. Pochan, β-hairpin peptide hydrogels for package delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2017. 110-111: p. 127-136. 60. Nagai, Y., et al., Slow release of molecules in self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold. Journal of Controlled Release, 2006. 115(1): p. 18-25. 61. Koutsopoulos, S., et al., Controlled release of functional proteins through designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber hydrogel scaffold. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. 106(12): p. 4623-4628. 62. Branco, M.C., et al., The effect of protein structure on their controlled release from an injectable peptide hydrogel. Biomaterials, 2010. 31(36): p. 9527-9534. 63. Kumar, V.A., et al., Highly Angiogenic Peptide Nanofibers. Acs Nano, 2015. 9(1): p. 860-868. 64. Laschke, M.W. and M.D. Menger, Prevascularization in tissue engineering: Current concepts and future directions. Biotechnology Advances, 2016. 34(2): p. 112-121. 65. Rice, J.J., et al., Engineering the Regenerative Microenvironment with Biomaterials. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2013. 2(1): p. 57-71. 66. Jain, R.K., et al., Engineering vascularized tissue. Nature Biotechnology, 2005. 23(7): p. 821-823. 67. Wang, T.W., et al., Effects of an injectable functionalized selfassembling nanopeptide hydrogel on angiogenesis and neurogenesis for regeneration of the central nervous system. Nanoscale, 2017. 9(42): p. 16281-16292. 68. Lai, H.J., et al., Tailored design of electrospun composite nanofibers with staged release of multiple angiogenic growth factors for chronic wound healing. Acta Biomaterialia, 2014. 10(10): p. 4156-4166. 69. Kim, J.H., et al., Stem cell recruitment and angiogenesis of neuropeptide substance P coupled with self-assembling peptide nanofiber in a mouse hind limb ischemia model. Biomaterials, 2013. 34(6): p. 1657-1668. 70. Webber, M.J., et al., Supramolecular nanostructures that mimic VEGF as a strategy for ischemic tissue repair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. 108(33): p. 13438-13443. 71. Jonker, A.M., D. Lowik, and J.C.M. van Hest, Peptide- and Protein-Based Hydrogels. Chemistry of Materials, 2012. 24(5): p. 759-773. 72. Cormier, A.R., et al., Molecular Structure of RADA16-I Designer Self-Assembling Peptide Nanofibers. Acs Nano, 2013. 7(9): p. 7562-7572. 73. Yokoi, H., T. Kinoshita, and S.G. Zhang, Dynamic reassembly of peptide RADA16 nanofiber scaffold. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. 102(24): p. 8414-8419. 74. Nagai, Y., et al., The mechanical stimulation of cells in 3D culture within a self-assembling peptide hydrogel. Biomaterials, 2012. 33(4): p. 1044-1051. 75. Hennink, W.E. and C.F. van Nostrum, Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2012. 64: p. 223-236. 76. Pisano, J.J., J.S. Finlayson, and M.P. Peyton, Cross-link in Fibrin Polymerized by Factor XIII: ε-(γ-Glutamyl)lysine. Science, 1968. 160(3830): p. 892-893. 77. Lee, Y.H., et al., Enzyme-crosslinked gene-activated matrix for the induction of mesenchymal stem cells in osteochondral tissue regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia, 2017. 63: p. 210-226. 78. Griffin, D.R., et al., Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks. Nature Materials, 2015. 14(7): p. 737. 79. Ranga, A., et al., Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels Formed in Situ by Transglutaminase-Catalyzed Reaction. Biomacromolecules, 2016. 17(5): p. 1553-1560. 80. Sakiyama-Elbert, S.E., Incorporation of heparin into biomaterials. Acta Biomaterialia, 2014. 10(4): p. 1581-1587. 81. Munoz, E.M. and R.J. Linhardt, Heparin-binding domains in vascular biology. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology, 2004. 24(9): p. 1549-1557. 82. Rajangam, K., et al., Heparin binding nanostructures to promote growth of blood vessels. Nano Letters, 2006. 6(9): p. 2086-2090. 83. Sasisekharan, R. and G. Venkataraman, Heparin and heparan sulfate: biosynthesis, structure and function. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 2000. 4(6): p. 626-631. 84. Belair, D.G., N.N. Le, and W.L. Murphy, Design of growth factor sequestering biomaterials. Chemical Communications, 2014. 50(99): p. 15651-15668. 85. Cabanas-Danes, J., J. Huskens, and P. Jonkheijm, Chemical strategies for the presentation and delivery of growth factors. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2014. 2(17): p. 2381-2394. 86. Eke, G., et al., Development of a UV crosslinked biodegradable hydrogel containing adipose derived stem cells to promote vascularization for skin wounds and tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2017. 129: p. 188-198. 87. Mammadov, R., et al., Growth Factor Binding on Heparin Mimetic Peptide Nanofibers. Biomacromolecules, 2012. 13(10): p. 3311-3319. 88. Zeng, Q., et al., Design of a thermosensitive bioglass/agarose–alginate composite hydrogel for chronic wound healing. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 2015. 3(45): p. 8856-8864. 89. Dhivya, S., V.V. Padma, and E. Santhini, Wound dressings–a review. BioMedicine, 2015. 5(4). 90. Dimatteo, R., N.J. Darling, and T. Segura, In situ forming injectable hydrogels for drug delivery and wound repair. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2018. 127: p. 167-184. 91. Zhu, J.M. and R.E. Marchant, Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 2011. 8(5): p. 607-626. 92. Zhu, J., Bioactive modification of poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2010. 31(17): p. 4639-4656. 93. Pugliese, R., et al., Cross-linked self-assembling peptide scaffolds. Nano Research, 2018. 11(1): p. 586-602. 94. Chen, C.X., et al., Hydrogelation of the Short Self-Assembling Peptide I(3)QGK Regulated by Transglutaminase and Use for Rapid Hemostasis. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2016. 8(28): p. 17833-17841. 95. Gundersen, M.T., J.W. Keillor, and J.N. Pelletier, Microbial transglutaminase displays broad acyl-acceptor substrate specificity. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014. 98(1): p. 219-230. 96. Loo, Y., et al., Self‐assembled proteins and peptides as scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Advanced healthcare materials, 2015. 4(16): p. 2557-2586. 97. Habibi, N., et al., Self-assembled peptide-based nanostructures: Smart nanomaterials toward targeted drug delivery. Nano Today, 2016. 11(1): p. 41-60. 98. Han, G. and R. Ceilley, Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments. Advances in Therapy, 2017. 34(3): p. 599-610. 99. Logsdon, E.A., et al., A systems biology view of blood vessel growth and remodelling. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 2014. 18(8): p. 1491-1508. 100. Freudenberg, U., et al., Glycosaminoglycan-Based Biohybrid Hydrogels: A Sweet and Smart Choice for Multifunctional Biomaterials. Advanced Materials, 2016. 28(40): p. 8861-8891. 101. Rajangam, K., et al., Peptide amphiphile nanostructure-heparin interactions and their relationship to bioactivity. Biomaterials, 2008. 29(23): p. 3298-3305. 102. Gainza, G., et al., Advances in drug delivery systems (DDSs) to release growth factors for wound healing and skin regeneration. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 2015. 11(6): p. 1551-1573. 103. Tayalia, P. and D.J. Mooney, Controlled growth factor delivery for tissue engineering. Advanced Materials, 2009. 21(32‐33): p. 3269-3285. 104. Awada, H.K., N.R. Johnson, and Y. Wang, Dual delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor coacervate displays strong angiogenic effects. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2014. 14(5): p. 679-686. 105. Hwang, B.W., et al., Supramolecular hydrogels encapsulating bioengineered mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic therapy. RSC Advances, 2018. 8(34): p. 18771-18775. 106. Nowak-Sliwinska, P., T. Segura, and M.L. Iruela-Arispe, The chicken chorioallantoic membrane model in biology, medicine and bioengineering. Angiogenesis, 2014. 17(4): p. 779-804. 107. Ribatti, D., The chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). A multifaceted experimental model. Mechanisms of Development, 2016. 141: p. 70-77. 108. Moreno-Jiménez, I., et al., The chorioallantoic membrane assay for biomaterial testing in tissue engineering: a short-term in vivo preclinical model. Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods, 2017. 23(12): p. 938-952.
|