帳號:guest(18.118.2.225)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):何玄
作者(外文):Govindarajan, Usharani Hareesh
論文名稱(中文):智慧型科技探勘-以工業4.0應用研究為例
論文名稱(外文):Intelligent Technology Mining– An Industry 4.0 Application Study
指導教授(中文):張瑞芬
張力元
指導教授(外文):Trappey, Amy J.C.
Trappey, Charles V.
口試委員(中文):巫木誠
趙平宜
胡美智
蔡宏營
口試委員(外文):Wu, Muh-Cherng
Chao, Ping-Yi
Hu, Mei-Chih
Tsai, Hung-Yin
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:跨院國際博士班學位學程
學號:105003856
出版年(民國):108
畢業學年度:107
語文別:英文
論文頁數:120
中文關鍵詞:智慧技術組件探勘集體智慧過度主題生成工業4.0 應用工業沉浸式科技
外文關鍵詞:Intelligence technology component miningcollective intelligenceexcessive topic generationindustry 4.0 applicationindustrial immersive technologies
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:77
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:33
  • 收藏收藏:0
科技的發展對產業及經濟的進步有著舉足輕重的地位,而科技研發往往產出大量的技術文件及數據資料。科技進步和傳播透過大量的文集,如國際期刊、專利文件、開放型知識文件庫及重要國際標準等技術文件,才得以讓技術擴散他人分享,並繼續尋求精進的方法。企業若想藉著創新的科技發展新產品必須運用科技探勘找尋新科技組件。主題生成模型是強大的自然語言處理 Natural Language Processing (NLP)工具,此模型能夠分析文集及其相關關鍵字詞分布。本論文發展的技術探勘方法,稱之為 Excessive Topic Generation (ETG),作為主題分析及視覺化的預處理框架。本論文發展出的ETG傳承了Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) 的主題生成模式且具有生成字詞之間距離關係的學習能力。本研究以工業4.0之工業沉浸式科技 Industry Immersive Technology (IIT) 的科技組件探勘為案例,以系統化 ETG、LDA等方法,探討 IIT之科技發展趨勢。本研究檢索出超過11,000份技術文檔做為工業4. 0科技探勘文件庫。本研究亦以 IIT專利之國際專利分類 International Patent Classification (IPC)及合作專利分類 Cooperation Patent Classification (CPC)自動分類對 ETG的結果進行驗證及比較。智慧科技探勘使用 ETG前處理將使得集體智慧運用於工程諮詢及商業智能得以實現。
Science and technology play a major role in advancing industry with significant effects on the world economy. An inevitable consequence of the technology-driven economy has led to an increase in technical document data. Technology components are now spread across a huge corpus of international publications, patents, open source repositories, blogs, and essential standards. Businesses wanting to adopt technology must conduct technology mining for key component integrations. This dissertation contributes to an advanced technology mining method named Excessive Topic Generation (ETG) as a preprocessing framework for topic term (referred to as key term) generation, visualization, and analysis. The presented ETG method inherits the topic generation characteristics from Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) with a further capability to generate word distance relationships among key terms. The framework is applied to a study of the advanced manufacturing domain encapsulated through Industry 4.0. Industry 4.0 outline combines conventional manufacturing practices with increased technological outreach over a corpus of more than 11,000 technical documents across public databases. A systematic drill down for Industrial Immersive Technology (IIT) over 2,164 technical documents covering Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Brain Machine Interface (BMI) concepts are demonstrated. A validation comparison of 741 global IIT patents against international invention indexation standards International Patent Classification (IPC) and the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) are conducted to validate the superior ETG results. Further, a conversational chatbot is integrated to distribute generated transformation. Intelligent technology mining using ETG enables collective intelligence for both engineering consultation and business intelligence.
中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
ACKNOWLEDGMENT III
TABLE OF CONTENTS IV
LIST OF FIGURES VII
LIST OF TABLES VIII
1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background and Motivation 1
1.2 Research Objectives 3
1.3 Research Procedure 4
1.4 Thesis Organization 4
2. LITERATURE REVIEW 6
2.1 Technology Mining Overview 6
2.1.1 Technology Mining State of the Art Analysis 8
2.1.2 Empirical Studies 11
2.1.3 Intelligent Mining Approaches 13
2.2 Summary and Discussions 17
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 20
3.1 Intelligent Technology Mining Using ETG 23
3.1.1 ETG Algorithm 25
3.2 System Requirements and Deployment 26
4. INDUSTRY 4.0 APPLICATION STUDY 28
4.1 Cyber Physical Systems (CPS) 30
4.2 Internet of Things (IoT) 33
4.3 Artificial Intelligence (AI) 35
4.4 Cloud and Big Data 37
4.5 Immersive Technologies 39
4.5.1 Technology Specifications 41
4.5.2 Governing Standards 43
4.5.3 Open Source Development 45
4.5.4 SDK and API Outreach 46
4.5.5 Patent Landscape 47
4.5.6 Patent Data Text Mining 51
4.5.7 ETG Key Term Discovery 54
4.5.8 Agglomerative Clustering 56
4.5.9 Key Findings 62
5. VALIDATIONS 66
6. CONVERSATIONAL INTERFACE INTEGRATION 71
6.1 System Design 72
6.2 System Demonstration 74
7. THESIS STATEMENT 78
8. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE SCOPE 81
REFERENCES 83
APPENDIX 1 – TECHNOLOGY MINING TERM FREQUENCY ANALYSIS 96
APPENDIX 2 – PUBLICATIONS WITH HIGH CITATIONS 98
APPENDIX 3 – INDUSTRY 4.0 PUBLICATIONS WITH HIGH CITATIONS 99
APPENDIX 4 – CPPS LITERATURE ONTOLOGY 102
APPENDIX 5 – IIoT LITERATURE ONTOLOGY 103
APPENDIX 6 – IIT KEY WORD COLLECTION 104
APPENDIX 7 – IMMERSIVE TECHNOLOGY TOP ASSIGNEE PATENTS 105
APPENDIX 8 – IIT TECHNOLOGY FUNCTION MATRIX 108
APPENDIX 9 – ETG TOP 150 TOPIC TERMS AND COUNT OF PATENTS 109
APPENDIX 10 – IIT ETG ONTOLOGY 111
APPENDIX 11 – “AUGMENTED” KEY PATENTS 112
APPENDIX 12 – KEY IIT PUBLICATIONS 114
APPENDIX 13 – KEY IIT PATENTS 115
APPENDIX 14 – KEY IIT STANDARDS 116
APPENDIX 15 – KEY OPEN SOURCE REPOSITORIES 117
APPENDIX 16 – PUBLICATIONS WITH A MANUFACTURING FOCUS 118

1. Agostini, L., Caviggioli, F., Filippini, R., & Nosella, A. (2015). Does patenting influence SME sales performance? A quantity and quality analysis of patents in Northern Italy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(2), 238-257.
2. Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015). Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(4), 2347-2376.
3. Altman, N., & Krzywinski, M. (2017). Points of significance: clustering. Nature Methods, 14, 545-546.
4. Aristodemou, L., & Tietze, F. (2018). The state-of-the-art on Intellectual Property Analytics (IPA): A literature review on artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning methods for analyzing intellectual property (IP) data. World Patent Information, 55, 37-51.
5. Asche, G. (2017). 80% of technical information found only in patents–Is there proof of this? World Patent Information, 48, 16-28.
6. Basanta-Val, P. (2018). An efficient industrial big-data engine. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(4), 1361-1369.
7. Beel, J., Gipp, B., Langer, S., & Breitinger, C. (2016). Paper recommender systems: a literature survey. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 17(4), 305-338.
8. Behmel, A., Höhl, W., & Kienzl, T. (2014). MRI design review system: A mixed reality interactive design review system for architecture, serious games and engineering using game engines, standard software, a tablet computer and natural interfaces. In Mixed and Augmented Reality International Symposium. 327-328.
9. Bhave, A., Krogh, B. H., Garlan, D., & Schmerl, B. (2011). View consistency in architectures for cyber-physical systems. In IEEE/ACM Second International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems,151-160.
10. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022.
11. Bowsher, K., Civillico, E. F., Coburn, J., Collinger, J., Contreras-Vidal, J. L., Denison, T., ... & Hoffmann, M. (2016). Brain-computer interface devices for patients with paralysis and amputation: a meeting report. Journal of neural engineering, 13(2), 023001.
12. Boyd-Graber, J., Hu, Y., & Mimno, D. (2017). Applications of topic models. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 11(2), 143-296.
13. Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., & Rosenberg, M. (2014). How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An Industry 4.0 perspective. International Journal of Mechanical, 8(1), 37-44.
14. Britz, D. (2016). Deep Learning for Chatbots, Part 1–Introduction, accessed on December. 10, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.wildml.com/2016/04/deep-learning-for-chatbots-part-1-introduction/
15. Calvo, H. (2014). Simple TF· IDF is not the best you can get for regionalism classification. In International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, 92-101.
16. Campana, S. E. (2001). Accuracy, precision and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. Journal of Fish Biology, 59(2), 197-242.
17. Chen, C. L., Tseng, F. S., & Liang, T. (2010). Mining fuzzy frequent itemsets for hierarchical document clustering. Information Processing & Management, 46(2), 193-211.
18. Chen, Z., & Doss, H. (2018). Inference for the number of topics in the latent Dirichlet allocation model via Bayesian mixture modeling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 1-44.
19. Cheng, F. T., Tieng, H., Yang, H. C., Hung, M. H., Lin, Y. C., Wei, C. F., & Shieh, Z. Y. (2016). Industry 4.1 for wheel machining automation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 1(1), 332-339.
20. Cheng, T. Y. (2012). A new method of creating technology/function matrix for systematic innovation without an expert. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 118-127.
21. Cheng, T. Y., & Wang, M. T. (2013). The patent-classification technology/function matrix-A systematic method for design around. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 18(2), 158-167.
22. Chien, C. F., & Chen, L. F. (2008). Data mining to improve personnel selection and enhance human capital: A case study in high-technology industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 280-290.
23. Chien, C. F., Wang, W. C., & Cheng, J. C. (2007). Data mining for yield enhancement in semiconductor manufacturing and an empirical study. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 192-198.
24. Columbus, L. (2016). Roundup of Internet of Things Forecasts and Market Estimates, accessed on December. 10, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2016/11/27/roundup-of-internet-of-things-forecasts-and-market-estimates-2016/#6bb488dd292d
25. De Beule, F., & Duanmu, J. L. (2012). Locational determinants of internationalization: A firm-level analysis of Chinese and Indian acquisitions. European Management Journal, 30(3), 264-277.
26. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Furnas, G. W., Landauer, T. K., & Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of The American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391-407.
27. DKE, Berlin, Germany. (2015). National Intelligent Manufacturing Standard System Construction Guidelines, accessed on February. 19, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.dke.de/resource/blob/929020/7080b1667308545c088901b39a111756/manufacturing-guidelines-data.pdf
28. DKE/DIN E. V., Berlin, Germany. (2014). German Standardization Roadmap Industrie 4.0 (Version 1), accessed on January. 10, 2016. [Online]. Available:https://www.dke.de/resource/blob/778248/d2afdaf62551586a54b3270ef78d2632/the-german-standardization-i4-0-e-version-1-0-data.pdf
29. Dumitrache, I., Caramihai, S. I., & Stanescu, A. (2013). From mass production to intelligent cyber-enterprise. In Control Systems and Computer Science, 399-404.
30. Efimenko, I. V., & Khoroshevsky, V. F. (2018). Advanced methods: identification of promising high-tech solutions with semantic technologies: energy, pharma, and other industries. World Scientific Book Chapters, 431-469.
31. Fantacci, R., Pecorella, T., Viti, R., & Carlini, C. (2014). Overcoming IoT fragmentation through standard gateway architecture. In 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things, 181-182.
32. Farooq, M. U., Waseem, M., Mazhar, S., Khairi, A., & Kamal, T. (2015). A review on internet of things (IoT). International Journal of Computer Applications, 113(1).
33. Feldman, R., Fresko, M., Hirsh, H., Aumann, Y., Liphstat, O., Schler, Y., & Rajman, M. (1998). Knowledge management: A text mining approach. In Practical Aspects of Knowledge Management, 9.
34. Fischer, T., & Henkel, J. (2012). Patent trolls on markets for technology–An empirical analysis of NPEs’ patent acquisitions. Research Policy, 41(9), 1519-1533.
35. Framework E. U., Directorate of the European Commission, & XVI, D. (2013). Understanding and Monitoring the Cost-Determining Factors of Infrastructure Projects, accessed on January. 10, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/5_full_en.pdf
36. Fujii, N. (2016). VR, AR, BMI, and IOA Approach and Relationship Between the Brain and Digital, accessed on April. 10, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://dentsu-ho.com/articles/3805
37. Garza, L. E., Pantoja, G., Ramírez, P., Ramírez, H., Rodríguez, N., González, E., ... & Pérez, J. A. (2013). Augmented reality application for the maintenance of a flapper valve of a Fuller-Kynion type M pump. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 154-160.
38. Goldberg, D. E., & Holland, J. H. (1988). Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Machine Learning, 3(2), 95-99.
39. Gölzer, P., Cato, P., & Amberg, M. (2015). Data processing requirements of Industry 4.0-Use cases for big data applications. In European Conference on Information Systems, 5-29.
40. Govindarajan, U. H., Trappey, A. J., & Kumar, G. (2017). Latent Dirichlet allocation modeling for CPS patent topic discovery. In International Conference on Industrial, Enterprise, and System Engineering.
41. Govindarajan, U. H., Trappey, A. J., & Trappey, C. V. (2016). Investigating Technology and Patent Portfolio of Lens-Less Cameras in the Context of Industry 4.0. In Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference.
42. Govindarajan, U. H., Trappey, A. J., & Trappey, C. V. (2018). Immersive technology for human-centric cyber physical systems in complex manufacturing processes: a comprehensive overview of the global patent profile using collective intelligence. Complexity, 148, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4283634 (online published).
43. Govindarajan, U. H., Trappey, A. J., & Trappey, C. V. (2018). Topics and trends in industrial internet of things (IIoT)- A 10-year patent data outlook. In Annual Conference of the International Information Management Association (IIMA), Houston, TX, USA.
44. Govindarajan, U. H., Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Yeh, L. C., & Bafila, A. S. (2018). Excessive topic generation: a pre-processing method for collective intelligence and relationship mining. In Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference.
45. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.
46. Guo, X., Park, H., & Magee, C. L. (2016). Decomposition and analysis of technological domains for better understanding of technological structure. Preprint arXiv:1604.06053.
47. Hagen, L. (2018). Content analysis of e-petitions with topic modeling: How to train and evaluate LDA models? Information Processing & Management, 54(6), 1292-1307.
48. Halarnkar, P., Shah, S., Shah, H., Shah, H., & Shah, A. (2012). A review on virtual reality. International Journal of Computer Science, 9(6), 323-330.
49. Hilson, G. (2009). Small-scale mining, poverty and economic development in sub-Saharan Africa: An overview. Resources Policy, 34(1-2), 1-5.
50. Hinkin, T. R., & Tracey, J. B. (1999). An analysis of variance approach to content validation. Organizational Research Methods, 2(2), 175-186.
51. Hoffman, M., Bach, F. R., & Blei, D. M. (2010). Online learning for latent Dirichlet allocation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 856-864.
52. Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 289-296.
53. Hsu, C. H. (2009). Data mining to improve industrial standards and enhance production and marketing: An empirical study in apparel industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 4185-4191.
54. Hu, F., Hao, Q., Sun, Q., Cao, X., Ma, R., Zhang, T., ... & Lu, J. (2017). Cyberphysical system with virtual reality for intelligent motion recognition and training. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 47(2), 347-363.
55. Huang, J. Y. (2016). Patent portfolio analysis of the cloud computing industry. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 39, 45-64.
56. Ianina, A., Golitsyn, L., & Vorontsov, K. (2017). Multi-objective topic modeling for exploratory search in tech news. In Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Springer, 181-193.
57. Islam, N., & Miyazaki, K. (2010). An empirical analysis of nanotechnology research domains. Technovation, 30(4), 229-237.
58. Jadeja, Y., & Modi, K. (2012). Cloud computing-concepts, architecture and challenges. In International Conference on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies, 877-880.
59. Jhuang, A. C., Sun, J. J., Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., & Govindarajan, U. H. (2017). Computer supported technology function matrix construction for patent data analytics. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 457-462.
60. Jin, Y., Li, G., & Zhang, C. (2015). Study of Data mining in social network analysis. Journal of Information &Computational Science, 12(16), 5947-5955.
61. Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., & Wahlster, W. (2013). Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative Industrie 4.0: Securing The Future of German Manufacturing Industry, a final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion.
62. Kantardzic, M. (2011). Data mining: concepts, models, methods, and algorithms. John Wiley & Sons.
63. Kim, Y. E., Schmidt, E. M., Migneco, R., Morton, B. G., Richardson, P., Scott, J., ... & Turnbull, D. (2010). Music emotion recognition: A state of the art review. In International Society for Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), 255-266.
64. Kivrak, S., Arslan, G., Akgun, A., & Arslan, V. (2013). Augmented reality system applications in construction project activities. In International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining, 11-15.
65. Lee, E. A. (2006). Cyber-physical systems-are computing foundations adequate. In Position Paper for NSF Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems: Research Motivation, Techniques and Roadmap, 2, 1-9.
66. Liao, Y., Deschamps, F., Loures, E. D. F. R., & Ramos, L. F. P. (2017). Past, present, and future of Industry 4.0-A systematic literature review and research agenda proposal. International Journal of Production Research, 55(12), 3609-3629.
67. Lison, P. (2012). An Introduction to Machine Learning, accessed on April. 20, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://heim.ifi.uio.no/plison/pdfs/talks/machinelearning.pdf
68. Liu, K., Yen, Y., & Kuo, Y. H. (2013). A quick approach to get a technology-function matrix for an interested technical topic of patents. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(6), 85-96.
69. Liu, X. Y., & Wu, M. Y. (2012). Vehicular CPS: An application of IoT in vehicular networks. Journal of Computer Applications, 32(4), 900-904.
70. Liu, Y., Niculescu-Mizil, A., & Gryc, W. (2009). Topic-link LDA: Joint models of topic and author community. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 665-672.
71. Maidi, M., Mallem, M., Benchikh, L., & Otmane, S. (2013). An evaluation of camera pose methods for an augmented reality system: Application to teaching industrial robots. In Transactions on Computational Science, 3-30.
72. Marr, D. (1977). Artificial intelligence—A personal view. Artificial Intelligence, 9(1), 37-48.
73. Martin, P., Tseu, A., Férey, N., Touraine, D., & Bourdot, P. (2014). A hardware and software architecture to deal with multimodal and collaborative interactions in multiuser virtual reality environments. In The Engineering Reality of Virtual Reality, 9012, 901209.
74. Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, accessed on January. 11, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://faculty.winthrop.edu/domanm/csci411/Handouts/NIST.pdf
75. Michelino, F., Cammarano, A., Lamberti, E., & Caputo, M. (2017). Open innovation for start-ups: A patent-based analysis of bio-pharmaceutical firms at the knowledge domain level. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(1), 112-134.
76. Miyazaki, K., & Islam, N. (2007). Nanotechnology systems of innovation—An analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation, 27(11), 661-675.
77. Moehrle, M. G., Walter, L., Bergmann, I., Bobe, S., & Skrzipale, S. (2010). Patinformatics as a business process: A guideline through patent research tasks and tools. World Patent Information, 32(4), 291-299.
78. Nayebi, M., Kabeer, S. J., Ruhe, G., Carlson, C., & Chew, F. (2018). Hybrid labels are the new measure! IEEE Software, 35(1), 54-57.
79. NLP.standford. (2018). Tokenization Concepts, accessed on June. 18. 2018 [Online]. Available: https://nlp.stanford.edu/IR-book/html/htmledition/tokenization-1.html
80. Park, H., Ree, J. J., & Kim, K. (2013). Identification of promising patents for technology transfers using TRIZ evolution trends. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 736-743.
81. Porter, A. L. (2007). How “tech mining” can enhance R&D management. Research-Technology Management, 50(2), 15-20.
82. Porter, A. L., & Cunningham, S. W. (2004). Tech mining: exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage. John Wiley & Sons, 29.
83. Rajman, M., Bui, T. H., Rajman, A., Seydoux, F., Trutnev, A., & Quarteroni, S. (2004). Assessing the usability of a dialogue management system designed in the framework of a rapid dialogue prototyping methodology. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 90(6), 1096-1111.
84. Rehurek, R. (2015). Experiments with the English Wikipedia. Gensim: Topic modeling for humans, Doctoral Thesis. Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
85. Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson Education Limited.
86. Sagot, S., Fougères, A. J., & Ostrosi, E. (2018). Collaborative engineering decision-making for building information channels and improving Web visibility of product manufacturers. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38, 264-276.
87. Sanislav, T., & Miclea, L. (2012). Cyber-physical systems-concept, challenges and research areas. Journal of Control Engineering and Applied Informatics, 14(2), 28-33.
88. Schofield, A., Magnusson, M., & Mimno, D. (2017). Pulling out the stops: Rethinking stopword removal for topic models. In European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 432-436.
89. Schweikardt, N., Schwentick, T., & Segoufin, L. (2010). Database theory: Query languages. In Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook, 19.1-19.33.
90. Shawar, B. A., & Atwell, E. (2002). A comparison between Alice and Elizabeth chatbot systems. The University of Leeds, School of Computing research report.
91. Song, M., & van der Aalst, W. M. (2007). Supporting process mining by showing events at a glance. In 17th Annual Workshop on Information Technologies and Systems, 139-145.
92. Song, M., & Van der Aalst, W. M. (2008). Towards comprehensive support for organizational mining. Decision Support Systems, 46(1), 300-317.
93. Stergiou, C., Psannis, K. E., Kim, B. G., & Gupta, B. (2018). Secure integration of IoT and cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems, 78, 964-975.
94. Sterzi, V. (2013). Patent quality and ownership: An analysis of UK faculty patenting. Research Policy, 42(2), 564-576.
95. Subashini, S., & Kavitha, V. (2011). A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(1), 1-11.
96. Sung, R. C., Ritchie, J. M., Lim, T., Liu, Y., & Kosmadoudi, Z. (2012). The Automated Generation of Engineering Knowledge using a Digital Engineering Tool: An Industrial Evaluation Case Study. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 9(06), 1271001.
97. Tayeb, S., Latifi, S., & Kim, Y. (2017). A survey on IoT communication and computation frameworks: An industrial perspective. In Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference, 1-6.
98. The United States Patent and Trademark Office. (2015). USPTO Patent Classification Scheme CPC, accessed on June. 10, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/cpc.html
99. Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Govindarajan, U. H., & Jhuang, A. C. (2018). Construction and validation of an ontology-based technology function matrix: text mining of cyber physical system patent portfolios. World Patent Information, 55, 19-24.
100. Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Govindarajan, U. H., & Sharma, A. (2018). Conversational service bot specifications for advanced manufacturing applications. In IEEE International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing (ICAM).
101. Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Govindarajan, U. H., Chuang, A. C., & Sun, J. J. (2017). A review of essential standards and patent landscapes for the Internet of Things: A key enabler for Industry 4.0. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 33, 208-229.
102. Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Govindarajan, U. H., Sun, J. J., & Chuang, A. C. (2016). A review of technology standards and patent portfolios for enabling cyber-physical systems in advanced manufacturing. IEEE Access, 4, 7356-7382.
103. Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Wang, T. M., & Tang, M. Y. (2017). Ontology-based technology function matrix for patent analysis of additive manufacturing in the dental industry. International Journal of Manufacturing Research, 12(1), 64-82.
104. Trappey, A. J., Trappey, C. V., Wu, C. Y., & Lin, C. W. (2012). A patent quality analysis for innovative technology and product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(1), 26-34.
105. Trappey, C.V., & Trappey, A.J.C. (2015). Collective intelligence applied to legal e-discovery: A ten-year case study of Australia franchise and trademark litigation. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29, 787-798.
106. Wamba, S. F., Akter, S., Edwards, A., Chopin, G., & Gnanzou, D. (2015). How ‘big data can make a big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 234-246.
107. Wang, B., Liu, S., Ding, K., Liu, Z., & Xu, J. (2014). Identifying technological topics and institution-topic distribution probability for patent competitive intelligence analysis: a case study in LTE technology. Scientometrics, 101(1), 685-704.
108. Wang, K. (2016). Intelligent predictive maintenance (IPdM) system–Industry 4.0 scenario. WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, 113, 259-268.
109. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45.
110. Wu, C. C., & Yao, C. B. (2012). Constructing an intelligent patent network analysis method. Data Science Journal, 11, 110-125.
111. Wu, D., Olson, D. L., & Dolgui, A. (2017). Artificial intelligence in engineering risk analytics. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 65, 433-435.
112. Wu, J. L., Chang, P. C., Tsao, C. C., & Fan, C. Y. (2016). A patent quality analysis and classification system using self-organizing maps with support vector machine. Applied Soft Computing, 41, 305-316.
113. Wu, M., Lu, T. J., Ling, F. Y., Sun, J., & Du, H. Y. (2010). Research on the architecture of the Internet of things. In Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, Vol. 5, 484.
114. Wu, X., Zhu, X., Wu, G. Q., & Ding, W. (2014). Data mining with big data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 26(1), 97-107.
115. Yan, Z., Duan, N., Bao, J., Chen, P., Zhou, M., Li, Z., & Zhou, J. (2016). Docchat: An information retrieval approach for chatbot engines using unstructured documents. In 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 516-525.
116. Yang, Z., Yue, Y., Yang, Y., Peng, Y., Wang, X., & Liu, W. (2011). Study and application on the architecture and key technologies for IoT. In Multimedia Technology, 747-751.
117. Zhang, Y., Porter, A. L., Hu, Z., Guo, Y., & Newman, N. C. (2014). Term clumping for technical intelligence: A case study on dye-sensitized solar cells. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 26-39.
118. Zhao, X., Chu, Y., Han, J., & Zhang, Z. (2016). SSVEP-based brain–computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation system for upper extremity rehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 46(7), 947-956.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top

相關論文

無相關論文
 
* *