面對全球化競爭激烈的環境趨勢下，新產品上市成功與否，絕大關鍵取決於上市的速度、成本的降低以及品質的要求，才能夠保有競爭的優勢。因此在二十一世紀，科技的快速變遷及全球激烈的競爭，新產品開發的效益與效率已經成為企業存續的基本條件與競爭力提升的重要關鍵因素。
在現今瞬息萬變的全球化環境中，與誰競爭？以什麼條件去競爭?是所有企業制定全球化競爭策略的關鍵。每家公司多年的產品研發經驗所累積的設計資料、資訊與知識，整合與驗證後可成為公司的無價資產。透過產品設計與生產製造的整合與管理，將這些知識轉化為設計與製造的電腦輔助設計的參數。本研究探討以知識化產品設計架構為基礎，研究產品設計之知識管理系統的方式選擇現有新產品開發之機構設計專案參考資料庫的歷史專案，如何來縮短與改善新產品開發之機構設計流程與品質。
從效率與效益的觀點為出發，以系統化的研究，了解新產品開發之模具設計各項要因因子，透過案例式推理的模式，有效的縮短新產品開發的時間，並且掌握模具開發的相關重要資訊，以達成真正有效且快速的開發出符合需求的新產品之目的。本研究以網路通訊產品為例，探討設計者使用機構設計引導系統與未使用機構引導系統，作時間與效率的差異的比較。結果發現使用機構引導系統在效能上約可以減少50%以上的時間，滑鼠點擊次數平均54.5~61.5次，而設計者在面對設計困擾時，知識庫系統也能提供適當的準則與方法，大幅的降低錯誤嘗試機率與加速設計開發時間。

Facing with the trend of globalized severe competition, to ensure the competitive advantage, the success of a new product launch lies in the speed of time-to-market, the decrease of cost, and the demand for quality requirement.
Hence, in 21th century, under the rapid swift of technology with competition scattered in global scale, it has been key factors to maintain the effectiveness, as well as effectiveness of new product development.
In current rapidly changing global environment “Whom to compete with?” “What to compete?” are in essence the key to form strategies for global competiveness.
After being integrated and verified, the over-the-years accumulated R&D data in product design, information and knowledge has been priceless asset for the company.
Through integration and management in product design and manufacturing, those knowledge would be transferred into parameters that will aid computerized production and design.
This research explores the structure of product design with computerized knowledge data as foundation and steps forward to observe the systematic approaches in product design to allow the current mechanical design of new product taking reference to historical projects, so that to achieve the goal of shortening and improving the flow and quality in mechanical design for new products.
Starting with efficiency and benefit, with the systematic research, one shall understand each important factor of the module design in new product development. Through the studying of reasoning in sample cases, effectively decreasing the time for new product development and fully controlling the relevant important information in development of module tool, the goal of true effectiveness and fast development cycle for new product design will be reached.
This research takes networking communication products as example, to further explore the comparison of difference in user groups between users who adopt mechanical navigating design system and those who don’t.
The result shows that mechanical navigating design system save more than 50% of time. When the designer is facing with design problems, the database system is able to provide adequate principle and method, to dramatically lower the probability of error attempts and accelerate the design development.

摘要 I
Abstract II
致謝 IV
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VII
第一章 導論 2
第一節 研究背景 2
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 機構設計導引與知識管理系統 5
第二節 國內外發展趨勢 6
第三節 競爭優勢及差異性 7
第四節 專案管理 8
第五節 流程引導架構 9
第六節 機構設計架構 9
第七節 知識管理架構 11
第三章 網通產業簡介 13
第一節 網通市場概況 13
第二節 網通技術及研究發展概況 17
第四章 研究方法 19
第一節 核心關鍵技術 19
第二節 研究效益 19
第三節 知識管理重要性 20
第四節 知識管理的效用 21
第五節 市場、環境及使用者需求 22
第六節 機構特徵參數化 24
第七節 模具設計內嵌化 25
第八節 歷史案例知識化 26
第九節 為檢查而設計(Design for Check, DFC) 30
第十節 為組裝而設計 (Design for Assembly, DFA) 31
第五章 實驗方法與分析 33
第一節 現況分析與評估 33
第二節 實驗分析與結果 34
第六章 結論 40
參考文獻 41

表1、機構特徵標準化 29
表2、傳統與系統特徵建立的方式比較 29
表3、特徵建立數量(案例一) 35
表4、特徵建構以時間比較 36
表5、特徵建構以滑鼠點擊次數比較 36
表6、特徵建立數量(案例二) 37
表7、時間比較(案例二) 37
表8、點擊數比較較(案例二) 37
表9、特徵建立數量(案例三) 38
表10、時間比較(案例三) 39
表11、點擊數比較較(案例三) 39
表12、節省設計時間(3案例) 40
圖1、圖庫、設計、系統整合性標準化流程 6
圖2、研究技術關聯圖 8
圖3、專案紀錄 9
圖4、Top-down Design 10
圖5、知識管理架構 12
圖6、資料、資訊與知識之間的關係圖 21
圖7、企業知識管理 22
圖8、高品質模具及產品供應架構 23
圖9、機構參數化設計 24
圖10、干涉檢查 26
圖11、自動化產生斜銷機構 26
圖12、歷史知識庫分類 28
圖13、塑膠件螺絲固定孔柱(Boss)模型 29
圖14、塑膠件卡勾/卡扣(Hook/Snap) 30
圖15、塑膠件卡勾/卡扣(Hook/Snap) 30
圖16、檢查自動化 31
圖17、為組裝而設計 32
圖18、案例一 35
圖19、案例二 36
圖20、案例三 38

References
中文部分：
王英裕、陳梅玲、魏伊伶、呂學隆、張雨婷編著，2009，2009 暨 2010 年我國網路通 訊產品產銷分析，IEK 產業服務-產業情報網。
周旭華譯，M. Porter 原著，1980，競爭策略：產業環境及競爭者分析，台北：天下文 化。
蘇怡仲譯，J. F. Moore 原著，2001，競爭加倍速：創新致勝，台北：智庫文化。

英文部分：
Anderson, C., 2006. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More, New York: Hyperion.
Brandenburger, A. M. and Nalebuff, B. J., 1995. The right game: use game theory to shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 51-71.
Chen, X., Gao, S., Yang, Y. & Zhang, S. (2012). Multi-Level Assembly Model for Top-Down Design of Mechanical Products. Computer-Aided Design, 44(10),1033-1048.
Calantone, R. J., Benedetto, C. A. D., and Song, M., 2010. The impact of industry environment on early market entry decisions by B2B managers in the U.S. and Japan, Industrial Marketing Management.
Dignum, F. & vab de Riet, R. P. (1991). Knowledge Base Modeling Based on Linguistics and Founded in Logic. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 7(1), 1-34.
E. M. Shehab, H. S. Abdalla, “Manufacturing Cost Modeling for Concurrent
Product Development”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol.
Fahey, L. & Prusak, L. (1998). The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 40(3), 265-276.
 Jong, W. R., Wu, C. H., Liu, H. H. & Li, M. Y. (2009). A Collaborative Navigation System for Concurrent Mold Design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 40(3-4), 215-225.
Lu, P. C. (2009). Top-Down Design for Mountain Bikes. Master Thesis, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan.
Lin, C. C. (2008). Navigating System for Collaborative Mechanism Design of 3C Product with Knowledge Management. Master Thesis, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan.
Mun, D., Hwang, J. & Han, S. (2009). Protection of Intellectual Property Based on a Skeleton Model in Product Design Collaboration. Computer-Aided Design,
Porter, M. E., 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: The Free Press.
Porter, M. E., 2008. The five competitive forces that shape strategy, Harvard
Parametric Technology Corporation, Pro/Engineer Wildfire 3.0 Pro/Web.Link User's Guide, PTC, 2005.17, Issue. 4.
R. I. Winner, J. P. Pennell, H. E. Bertrent, M. M. G. Slusarczuk, “ The Role of
Concurrent Engineering in Weapons System Acquisition”, IDA Report R338,
Alexandria VA: Institute for Defense Analyses, 1988.
Tang, M., Wen, Y., Mi, X. F. & Dong, J. X. (2001). Parametric Modeling with User-Defined Features. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, 207-211.
Turng, L. S., DeAugistine, D. & Taam, B. (1998). A Knowledge Base System for the Design and Manufacture of Injection-Molded Plastic Products. IEEE Information Technology Conference, Syracuse, New York, 95-98.
Yang, Y. D., Zhang, S. T., Li, Z. H. & Gao, S. M. (2006). Task Planning for Top-Down Collaborative Assembly Design. CSCWD Technical Program, 1-6.
Y. Yang, S. Zhang, Z. Li, S. Gao, “Task Planning for Top-down Collaborative
Assembly Design”, CSCWD Technical Program, 2006.