帳號:guest(3.22.74.66)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):倪福全
作者(外文):Ni, Fu-Chuan
論文名稱(中文):創業家精神對中小企業併購策略之影響:以CF公司為例
論文名稱(外文):The Impact of Entrepreneurship on the Corporate Merger and Acquisition Strategy in Small and Medium Enterprises: Lessons from the CF Company
指導教授(中文):丘宏昌
指導教授(外文):Chiu,Hung-Chang
口試委員(中文):謝依靜
謝英哲
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:高階經營管理碩士在職專班
學號:104075528
出版年(民國):106
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:92
中文關鍵詞:中小企業創業家精神企業併購併購策略併購後整合組織學習
外文關鍵詞:small and medium enterprisesentrepreneurshipmerger and acquisitionM&A strategiespost-merger integrationsorganizational learning
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:516
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏收藏:0
成長對於一家追求永續經營的企業,是必要的策略。併購是成長策略的一環,過去研究併購的對象,多數集中在大型企業,很少以中小企業為主。此外,併購的研究主題,也多集中在併購動機、併購決策、併購模式、併購談判、併購後整合、與併購後的財務績效與成敗等,很少探討創業家精神在併購決策與併購成敗中所扮演的角色。併購後的績效,以往的研究,也著重在一至三年或五年的財務績效。但本研究的結果卻認為,研究中小企業的併購,若僅著眼於三至五年的財務績效,是無法判定此一併購案的成功與否。本研究以質性研究的個案研究法,針對第一代中小企業主在進行重大併購案時,創業家精神在併購過程中所扮演的角色進行研究。研究結果發現,白手起家的中小企業主在進行併購決策時,其關鍵思考點與一般專業經理人所思考的有所差異;在併購後發生及發現併購前未預期的內憂外患而導致嚴重的虧損時,以及在併購後整合的過程,也堅持不懈的帶動組織學習,以避免併購案的失敗,並成功轉敗為勝,使企業集團步入倍數成長的階段。此一轉敗為勝的歷程,創業家精神皆扮演了一個重要的關鍵角色。本研究並對過去的研究質疑,認為,中小企業與國際性大型企業財團,在併購後整合方面,尤其是非關聯性的多角化併購,由於資源與人才的不足,併購後整合的過程,需要歷經更長的學習內化時間。過去以一至五年進行併購績效成敗的研究,用來對中小企業的併購績效進行評價,或許是不恰當的。
關鍵字:中小企業、創業家精神、企業併購、併購策略、併購後整合、組織學習

For a company pursuing sustainable development, growth is an essential strategy. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is a part of growth strategy. In the past, studies on M&A focus mostly on large enterprises and few on small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Also, topics covered in those studies are mainly on the motivations, decision-making, structures, negotiations, post-merger integration, financial synergies and success of M&A activities. The role of entrepreneurship in the decision-making process and the ultimate success of M&A is rarely touched upon. On post-merger synergies, the past studies emphasize on the 1~3 years or 5-year financial synergies. However, in this study, we found that when studying M&A of SMEs, we should not judge the success of an M&A activity based only on the financial synergies derived in 3~5 years. In this qualitative case study, it is found that the key decision-making points of the founding owner-managers of SMEs are somewhat different to professional managers. In fact, entrepreneurship does play a key role in turning defeat into victory, for example, when the enterprise encountered serious financial losses post-M&A as a result of unexpected internal and/or external turmoil; in post-merger integration, persistently leading organizational learning to avoid merger failure, and consequently, allowing the enterprise to grow exponentially. This study also questions past studies in that, as SMEs have less resources and human capital compared to large multinational enterprises, it takes longer in the post-merger integration process. The 1~5 year financial benchmarks commonly used in past studies are perhaps inappropriate for the SMEs M&A.
Keywords: Small and medium enterprises, entrepreneurship, merger and acquisition, M&A strategies, post-merger integrations, organizational learning.
摘要........................II
Abstract....................III
誌謝........................IV
目錄.........................V
圖目錄........................VI
表目錄........................VII
壹、導論.......................1
一、研究背景與動機..............1
二、研究目的....................4
三、研究流程....................6
貳、文獻探討....................7
一、創業家......................7
二、創業家精神...................9
三、中小企業....................12
四、併購動機與策略...............14
五、併購策略與創業家精神之關係.....18
參、研究方法.....................20
肆、個案探討與分析................23
伍、研究結果分析..................71
一、研究結論......................71
二、理論貢獻......................80
三、實務貢獻......................81
四、研究限制與未來研究建議..........83
陸、參考文獻...................... 84
附錄一 CF公司重要事件年表...........92
圖目錄
圖1-1 研究流程圖................. 6
圖4-1 HW組織圖 (200608)..........46
圖4-2 CF集團組織圖................60
圖4-3 HW歷年銷售量趨勢圖(2006-2016)...... 62
圖4-4 HW歷年營業額趨勢圖(2006-2016)...... 62
圖5-1 併購流程圖 77
圖5-2 創業家精神與併購決策流程之整合架構..... 79
表目錄
表3-1 問題類型與不同的研究策略.............. 22
表4-1 CF併購經驗......................... 41
表4-2 併購後HW歷年營業額與銷售量比較表....... 61
中文文獻
1.CF併購HW的影響(2016.06),CF集團提供。
2.CF併購經驗彙編(2016年版),CF集團總管理處提供。
3.CF集團四十年(2016.11),CF集團總管理處提供。
4.吳超鵬、吳世農與鄭方鑣(2008),管理者行為與連續購併績效的理論與實證研究─中國上市公司研究。管理世界(2008),第七期。(本文為中國國家自然科學基金重點項目「公司財務管理若干基礎問題研究」贊助廈門大學管理學院之研究)。
5.周育叡(2012),創業家的失敗學習─經驗釋意與「韌力─學習」模型之建構。國立中正大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
6.林珮萱(2016),航太精英2) 獨家飛機座椅泡綿 千度高溫燒不融。遠見雜誌366期。
7.洪世章(2016),創新六策─寫給創新者的關鍵思維。初版,聯經出版公司。
8.洪國爵(2014),以生命系統演化觀點建構跨國企業併購架構。逢甲大學商學博士學位學程博士論文。
9.胡釗維(2006),中國泡綿、全球尼龍束帶雙冠王。商業周刊994期。
10.孫梅瑞與陳隆麒(2002),國內上市公司從事購併活動對經營績效影響之研究。中山管理評論,第十卷,第一期。
11.陳介玄(2001),班底與老闆─台灣企業組織能力之發展。初版,聯經出版公司。
12.陳怡珮、林翠蓉、候啟娉、張力、與謝佩娟(2012),家族所有權、公司治理與風險馬承擔關係。輔仁管理評論,第十九卷,第二期。
13.莊喬木(2003),併購對主併公司及其競爭者長短期績效之影響。國立高雄第一科技大學財務管理所未出版之碩士論文。
14.黃咸鈞(2016),併購技術綜效創新-以史丹利百得工具機集團為例。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所 碩士學位論文。
15.劉子歆(2004),策略創業與價值創造:一個比較性個案研究。國立清華大學博士論文。
16.蔡敦浩(2009),管理概論。初版,滄海書局。

英文文獻
1.Ansoff, H. I., 1988. The new corporate: strategy, 3rd. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
2.Athreye, S., Kapur S., 2009. Introduction: the internationalization of Chinese and Indian firms—trends, motivations, and strategy. Industrial and Corporate Change 18(2): 209-221.
3.Austin, J., Stevenson, H. and Wei-Skillern., J., 2006. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 1-22.
4.Baird, I. S. and Thomas, H., 1985. Toward a Contingency model of strategic risk taking. Academy of management review, 10, 230-243
5.Baker T., Nelson R. E., 2005. Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly 50(3): 329-366.
6.Beckenstein, A. R., 1979. Merger activity and merger theories: an empirical investigation. Antitrust Bulletin, Spring, 105-128.
7.Billett, M. and Qian, Y., 2005. Are overconfidence Managers Born or Made? Evidence of Self-Attribution Bias from Frequent Acquirers. Working Paper, University of Iowa.
8.Bingham, C., Eisenhardt, K. and Furr N., 2007. What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, Strategy, and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1(1/2): 27-47.
9.Birkinshaw, J., 2000. Entrepreneurship in the global firm. London: Sage Publications.
10.Bowen, D. D. and Hisrich, R. D., 1986. The Female entrepreneur: A career development persective. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 393-407.
11.Brouthers, K. D., Hastenburg P. V., and Ven, J. V. D., 1998. If Most Mergers Fail Why Are They so Popular? Long Range Plannig, Vol. 31, 347-353.
12.Brown, T.E., Davidson, P. and Wiklund, J., 2001. An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneur-ship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Srategic Management Journal, 22: 953-968.
13.Busenitz, L. W., West, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N. and Zacharakis, A., 2003. Entrepreneurship research in emergence: Past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-308.
14.Cassell, C., and Symon, G., 1994. Qualitative research in work contexts. Qualitative methods in organizational research: Apractical guide, 1-13.
15.Copeland, T., Koller, T., and Murrin, J., 1994. Valuation- Measuing and Managing the Value of Company, 2nd Ed., N.Y.: John Wiley.
16.Covin, J.G. and Slevin, D.P., 1988. The Influece of Organiztion Structure on The Utility of An Entrepreneurial Top Management Style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), 105-180.
17.Doukas, J. and Petmezas, D., 2006. Acquisitions, Overconfident Managers and Self-Attribution Bias, Working Paper Old Dominion University.
18.Drucker, P., 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper and Row.
19.Eckhardt, J. T. and Shane, S. A., 2003. Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3): 333-349.
20.Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. 1983., Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 26(2): 301-325.
21.Feltham, T. S., Feltham, G. and Barnett, J. J., 2005. The Dependence of Family Business on a Single Decision-Maker. Journal of Small Management, Vol. 43(1), 1-15.
22.Fuller, K., Netter, J. and Stegemoller, M., 2002. What Do Retuns to Acquiring Firms Tell Us? Evidence from Firms that Make Many Acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 57, pp.1763-1793
23.Gammelgaaed, J., 2004. Access of competence: an emerging acquisition Motive. European Business Forum, Vol. 17, 44-47.
24.Gartner, W. B. and Birley, S., 2002. Introduction to the special issue on qualitative methods in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5): 387-395.
25.Jensen, M.C., 1984. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeover. America Economic Review, Vol.76, pp.323-329.
26.Kirzner, I. M., 1973. Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.Lieberman, M. and Montgomery, D., 1988. First-mover advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 41-58.
28.Low, M. B. and MacMillan, I. C., 1988. Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenge. Journal of Management, 14(2): 139-161.
29.Lumpkin, G.T. and Dess, Gregory G., 1996. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172.
30.Madhok A., Keyhani M., 2012. Acquisitions as Entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, Opportunities, and the Internationalization of Multinationals from Emerging Economies. Global Strategy Journal 2: 26-40.
31.Miller, D., 1983. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, pp.770-791.
32.Miller D., 2003. An asymmetry-based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability. Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 961-976.
33.Moore, D. P., 1990. An Examination of Present Research on the Female Entrepreneur – Suggested Research Strategies for the 1990’s. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4), 275-281.
34.Nayyar D., 2008. The internationalization of firms from India: investment, mergers, and acquisitions. Oxford Development Studies 36(1), 111-131.
35.Patton, E. and Appelbaum, S. H., 2003.The case for case studies in management research. Management Research News, 26(5), 60-71.
36.Patton, M. Q., 1987. How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.Porter, M. E., 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
38.Porter, M. E., 1987. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(3), pp. 43-59.
39.Ramamurti, R. and Singh J. V., 2009. Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K.
40.Roll, R.,1986. The Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers, Journal of Business, Vol59, 197-216.
41.Schmidt, D. R. and Fowler, K. L., 1990. Post-acquisition financial performance and executive compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 11(7), 559-569.
42.Schumpeter, J., 1934. Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pess.
43.Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N. and Buchholtz, A. K., 2001. Agency Relationship in Family Firm: Theory and Evidence. Organization Science , Vol. 12(2), 99-116.
44.Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H. and Dino, R. N., 2003. Toward a Theory of Agency and Altruism in Family Firms. Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 18(4), 473-490.
45.Sorensen, D. E., 2000. Characteristics of Merging Firms. Journal of Economics and Business, Vol.52, 423-433
46.Seth, A., K. Song and Pettit, R. R., 2002. Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: an empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.23, pp.921-940.
47.Shane, S. and Venkataraman, S., 2000. The promise of entrepre-neurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217-226.
48.Sharma, P. and Chrisman, J. J., 1999. Tiward a Reconciliation of the Definition an Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11-27.
49.Sirower , M.L., 1997. The synergy trap: How companies lose the acquisition game. The Free Press(New York, Book ISBN 0684832550)
50.Stevenson, H. H. and Jarillo, J.C., 1986. Preserving entrepreneurship as companies grow. Journal of Business Strategy, 7: 10-23.
51.Stevenson, H. H. and Jarillo, J. C., 1990. A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 11: 17-27.
52.Stigler, G. J., 1983. The organization of industry. 95-107, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
53.Sudarsanam, P. S., 1995. The essence of mergers and acquisitions. London: Prentice Hall Europe.
54.Switzer, J. A., 1996. Evidence on Real Gains in Corporate Acquisitions. Journal of Economics and Business 48, 443-460.
55.Teece, D., 1980. Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise. Economic Behavior and Organization. 1(3): 223-247.
56.Timmons, J. A., 1986. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, Cambridge, Massachuset - TS ", Ballinger Publishing。
57.Timmons, J.A., and Spinelli, S., 2007. New Venture Creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st Century(7th ed).NY: McGraw-Hill. Timmons, J. A. & Spinelli, S. 2007. New Venture Creation. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
58.Trautwein, F., 1990. Merger Motives and Merger Prescriptions. Strategic Management Journal, 11(1), 283-295.
59.Venkatraman, N., 1989. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35, 942-962.
60.Venkataraman, S. and Sarasvathy, S. D., 2001. Strategy and entrepreneurship: Outlines of an untold story. In Handbook of Strategic Management. Hitt, M. A. Freeman, E., Harrison, J. S.(eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.
61.Yagil, J., 1996. Mergers and macro-economic factors. Review of Financial Economics, Vol.5, 181-190.
62.Yin, R. K., 1994. Case study Research: Design and Methords, 2nd edition. London, CA: Sage.
(此全文未開放授權)
電子全文
中英文摘要
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *