|
References [1] Alistair Sutcliffe. “Designing for user engagement: Aesthetic and attractive user interfaces”. Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics 2.1 (2009), pp. 1–55. [2] Marc Hassenzahl and Noam Tractinsky. “User experience-a research agenda”. Be- haviour & information technology 25.2 (2006), pp. 91–97. [3] R John Leigh and David S Zee. The neurology of eye movements. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015. [4] Helen Robinson, Anna Wysocka, and Chris Hand. “Internet advertising effectiveness: the effect of design on click-through rates for banner ads”. International Journal of Advertising 26.4 (2007), pp. 527–541. [5] MSCOM. The GUI versus the Command Line: Which is better? URL : https: //blogs.technet.microsoft.com/mscom/2007/03/12/the-gui- versus-the-command-line-which-is-better-part-1/. [6] Computer Hope. Command line vs. GUI. URL : https://www.computerhope. com/issues/ch000619.htm. [7] James YL Thong, Weiyin Hong, and Kar Yan Tam. “Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2012). [8] Jane Frank. Role-Playing Game and Collectible Card Game Artists: A Biographical Dictionary. McFarland. [9] Titus Chalk. 20 Years Of Magic: The Gathering, A Game That Changed The World. URL : https://sabotagetimes.com/life/20-years-of-magic- the-gathering-a-game-that-changed-the-world. [10] Pokemon Co. Business Summary. URL : http://www.pokemon.co.jp/ corporate/en/services/. [11] AllegraFrank. Hearthstone now has 50 million players. URL : https://www. polygon.com/2016/4/26/11511890/hearthstone-50-million- players-2016. [12] Robert S Weiss. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. Simon and Schuster, 1995. [13] Irving Seidman. Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press, 2013. [14] John M Johnson. “In-depth interviewing”. Handbook of interview research: Context and method (2002), pp. 103–119. |