|
1. Abbott, R. J. et al., 2000. Migration and refugia in the Arctic. Science, 25 8, Volume 289, pp. 1343-1346. 2. Adams III, E. N., 1972. Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic trees. Systematic Zoology, 21(4), pp. 390-397. 3. Adams III, E. N., 1986. N-trees as nestings: complexity, similarity, and consensus. Journal of Classification, 3(2), pp. 299-317. 4. Aho, A. V., Sagiv, Y., Szymanski, T. G. & Ullman, J. D., 1981. Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with an application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM Journal of Computing, 8, 10(3), pp. 405-421. 5. Amenta, N., Clarke, F. & St. John, K., 2003. A linear-time majority tree algorithm. s.l., s.n., pp. 216-227. 6. Amir, A. & Keselman, D., 1997. Maximum agreement subtree in a set of evolutionary trees: metrics and efficient algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(6), pp. 1656-1669. 7. Bandelt, H.-J. & Dress, A., 1989. Weak hierarchies associated with similarity measures--an additive clustering technique. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 51(1), pp. 133-166. 8. Barthélemy, J. P. & McMorris, F. R., 1986. The median procedure for n-trees. Journal of Classification, Volume 3, pp. 329-334. 9. Baum, B. R., 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon, 2, 41(1), pp. 3-10. 10. Berry, V. & Bryant, D., 1999. Faster reliable phylogenetic analysis. s.l., s.n., pp. 59-68. 11. Berry, V. & Gascuel, O., 2000. Inferring evolutionary trees with strong combinatorial evidence. Theoretical Computer Science, 17 6, 240(2), pp. 271-298. 12. Boivin, G. et al., 2002. Virological features and clinical manifestations associated with human metapneumovirus: a new paramyxovirus responsible for acute respiratory-tract infections in all age groups. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1 11, 186(9), pp. 1330-1334. 13. Bremer, K., 1990. Combinable component consensus. Cladistics, 6(4), pp. 369-372. 14. Bryant, D., 2003. A classification of consensus methods for phylogenetics. In: M. F. Janowitz, et al. eds. Bioconsensus. Providence(RI): American Mathematical Society, pp. 163-184. 15. Bryant, D. & Berry, V., 2001. A structured family of clustering and tree construction methods. Advances in Applied Mathematics, Volume 27, pp. 705-732. 16. Bryant, D. & Moulton, V., 1999. A polynomial time algorithm for constructing the refined Buneman tree. Applied Mathematics Letter, Volume 12, pp. 51-56. 17. Bryant, D. & Waddell, P., 1998. Rapid evaluation of least-squares and minimum-evolution criteria on phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, Volume 15, pp. 1346-1359. 18. Buneman, O. P., 1971. The recovery of trees from measures of dissimilarity. In: F. R. Hodson, D. G. Kendall & P. Tautu, eds. Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 387-395. 19. Constantinescu, M. & Sankoff, D., 1995. An efficient algorithm for supertrees. Journal of Classification, Volume 12, pp. 101-112. 20. Cotton, J. A. & Wilkinson, M., 2007. Majority-rule supertrees. Systematic Biology, 56(3), pp. 445-452. 21. Day, W. H. E., 1985. Optimal algorithms for comparing trees with labeled leaves. Journal of Classification, 12, 2(1), pp. 7-28. 22. Day, W. H. E. & Sankoff, D., 1986. Computational complexity of inferring phylogenies by compatibility. Systematic Zoology, 6, 35(2), pp. 224-229. 23. Dong, J., Fernández-Baca, D., McMorris, F. R. & Powers, R. C., 2010. Majority-rule (+) consensus trees. Mathematical Biosciences, 228(1), pp. 10-15. 24. Felsenstein, J., 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland(MA.): Sinauer Associates, Inc.. 25. Felsenstein, J., 2005. PHYLIP, version 3.6 Software package, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington. Seattle: s.n. 26. Foulds, L. R. & Graham, R. L., 1982. The Steiner problem in phylogeny is NP-complete. Advances in Applied Mathematics, Volume 3, pp. 43-49. 27. Goloboff, P. A. et al., 2003. Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics, 19(4), pp. 324-332. 28. Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. C., 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics, 24(5), pp. 774-786. 29. Gordon, A. D., 1980. On the Assessment and Comparison of Classifications. In: R. Tomassone, ed. Analyse de Données et Informatique. Le Chesnay: INRIA. 30. Hendy, M. D., Little, C. H. C. & Penny, D., 1984. Comparing trees with pendant vertices labelled. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 10, 44(5), pp. 1054-1065. 31. Henzinger, M. R., King, V. & Warnow, T., 1999. Constructing a tree from homeomorphic subtrees, with application to computational evolutionary biology. Algorithmica, Volume 24, pp. 1-13. 32. Holder, M. T., Sukumaran, J. & Lewis, P. L., 2008. A justification for reporting the majority-rule consensus tree in Bayesian phylogenetics. Systematic Biology, 57(5), pp. 814-821. 33. Jansson, J., Li, Z.-X. & Sung, W.-K., 2017. On finding the Adams consensus tree. Information and Computation, Volume 256, pp. 334-347. 34. Jansson, J., Ramesh, R., Shen, C. & Sung, W.-K., 2018. Algorithms for the majority rule (+) consensus tree and the frequency difference consensus tree. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 15(1), pp. 15-26. 35. Jansson, J., Shen, C. & Sung, W.-K., 2016. Improved algorithms for constructing consensus trees. Journal of the ACM, 6, Volume 63. 36. Jansson, J. & Sung, W.-K., 2013. Constructing the R* consensus tree of two trees in subcubic time. Algorithmica, Volume 66, pp. 329-345. 37. Jansson, J., Sung, W.-K., Vu, H. & Yiu, S.-M., 2016. Faster algorithms for computing the R* consensus tree. Algorithmica, Volume 76, pp. 1224-1244. 38. Kannan, S., Warnow, T. & Yooseph, S., 1998. Computing the local consensus of trees. SIAM Journal on Computing, 27(6), pp. 1695-1724. 39. Kubicka, E., Kubicki, G. & McMorris, F. R., 1995. An algorithm to find agreement subtrees. Journal of Classification, Volume 12, pp. 91-99. 40. Lapointe, J. F. & Cucumel, G., 1997. The average consensus procedure: combination of weighted trees containing identical or overlapping sets of taxa. Systematic Biology, 1 6, 46(2), pp. 306-312. 41. Leung, M.-Y., Paszkowski, C. A. & Russell, A. P., 2014. Genetic structure of the endangered greater short-horned lizard (Phrynosoma hernandesi) in Canada: evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 92(10), pp. 875-883. 42. Luo, Z.-X., Ji, Q., Wible, J. R. & Yuan, C.-X., 2003. An early Cretaceous tribosphenic mammal and metatherian evolution. Science, Volume 302, pp. 1934-1940. 43. Margush, T. & McMorris, F. R., 1981. Consensus n-trees. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, Volume 43, pp. 239-244. 44. McMorris, F. R., Meronk, D. B. & Neumann, D. A., 1983. A view of some consensus methods for trees. s.l., Springer-Verlag, pp. 122-126. 45. McMorris, F. R. & Wilkinson, M., 2011. Conservative supertree. Systematic Biology, 6 1, 60(2), pp. 232-238. 46. Moncalvo, J.-M.et al., 2002. One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Volume 23, pp. 357-400. 47. Nelson, G., 1979. Cladistic Analysis and Synthesis: Principles and Definitions, with a Historical Note on Adanson's Familles Des Plantes (1763–1764). Systematic Biology, 1 3, 28(1), pp. 1-21. 48. Neumann, D. A., 1983. Faithful consensus methods for n-trees. Mathematical Biosciences, Volume 63, pp. 271-287. 49. Ng, M. P. & Wormald, N. C., 1996. Reconstruction of rooted trees from subtrees. Discrete Applied Mathematics, Volume 69, pp. 19-31. 50. Page, D. M., 1990. Tracks and trees in the antipodes: A reply to Humphries and Seberg. Systematic Zoology, 39(3), pp. 288-299. 51. Page, R. D. M., n.d. COMPONENT, Tree comparison software for Microsoft Windows. 2.0 ed. London: The Natural History Museum. 52. Phillips, C. & Warnow, T. J., 1996. The assymetric median tree - a new model for building consensus. Discrete Applied Mathematics, Volume 71, pp. 311-335. 53. Ragan, M. A., 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 3, 1(1), pp. 53-58. 54. Raxworthy, C. J., Forstner, M. R. J. & Nussbaum, R. A., 2002. Chameleon radiation by oceanic dispersal. Nature, 14 2, Volume 415, pp. 784-787. 55. Rohlf, F. J., 1982. Consensus indices for comparing classifications. Mathematical Biosciences, Volume 59, pp. 131-144. 56. Ronquist, F., 1998. Fast Fitch-parsimony algorithms for large data sets. Cladistics, 14(4), pp. 387-400. 57. Steel, M., 1992. The complexity of reconstructing trees from qualitative characters and subtrees. Journal of Classification, Volume 9, pp. 91-116. 58. Steel, M., 2016. Phylogeny: Discrete and Random Processes in Evolution. s.l.:SIAM, 2016. 59. Steel, M. & Velasco, J. D., 2014. Axiomatic opportunities and obstacles for inferring a species tree from gene trees. Systematic Biology, 63(5), pp. 772-778. 60. Steel, M. & Warnow, T., 1993. Kaikoura tree theorems: computing the maximum agreement subtree. Information Processing Letters, Volume 48, pp. 77-82. 61. Stinebrickner, R., 1984. s-consensus trees and indices. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 46(5-6), pp. 923-935. 62. Stinebrickner, R., 1986. s-consensus index method: an additional axiom. Journal of Classification, 3(2), pp. 319-327. 63. Swofford, D. L., 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent?. In: M. M. Miyamoto & J. Cracraft, eds. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 295-333. 64. Swofford, D. L., 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sunderland(Massachusetts): Sinauer Associates. 65. Swofford, D. L., Olsen, G. J., Waddell, P. J. & Hillis, D. M., 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz & B. K. Mable, eds. Molecular Systematics. 2 ed. s.l.:Sinauer, pp. 407-514. 66. Wareham, H., 1985. An efficient algorithm for computing Ml consensus trees, B. Sc. Honours thesis. s.l.:Memorial University of Newfoundland.
|