帳號:guest(18.116.43.47)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):王冠傑
作者(外文):Wang, Kuan-Chieh
論文名稱(中文):運用學習策略尋找艾爾法酒吧 賽局之奈許平衡
論文名稱(外文):Learning to Play an El Farol Bar Game
指導教授(中文):李端興
指導教授(外文):Lee, Duan-Shin
口試委員(中文):張正尚
黃之浩
口試委員(外文):Chang, Cheng-Shang
Huang, Scott C.-H.
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:資訊工程學系所
學號:104062617
出版年(民國):106
畢業學年度:105
語文別:英文
論文頁數:43
中文關鍵詞:艾爾法酒吧賽局理論奈許平衡學習理論
外文關鍵詞:El Farol bargame theoryNash equilibriumlearning theory
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:967
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:16
  • 收藏收藏:0
在這篇論文中,我們首先分析了一個艾爾法酒吧賽局的虛擬決策過程, 然後我們考慮一個廣義的艾爾法酒吧賽局, 我們提出了在廣義的艾爾法酒吧賽局中,玩家的學習過程將達到奈許平衡。之後我們提出一個學習過程是由強化學習方法和虛擬決策的混合,我們將這個混合的學習過程應用於艾爾法酒吧賽局。
In this paper we first analyze the fictitious play process of an El Farol bar game. We then consider a generalized El Farol bar game. We propose a learning procedure for the players in the generalized El Farol bar game to reach a Nash equilibrium. The proposed learning procedure is a mixture of the reinforcement learning method and the fictitious play method.
中文摘要i
Abstract ii
Acknowledgements iii
List of Figures vi
List of Tables vii
1 Introduction 1
2 Fictitious Play of an El Farol Bar Game 5
2.1 A Special Case in which c = N-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 A Special Case in which c = 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.3 A General Case in which c = 2: : :N-2 . . . . . . . . . 20
3 A Generalized El Farol Bar Game 25
4 Reinforcement Learning and Fictitious Play 29
5 Numerical and Simulation Results 32
5.1 Simulation settings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
5.2 Reinforcement learning method . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
5.3 Fictitious play method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
5.4 Mixed method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
6 Conclusions 41
Bibliography 42
[1] D. Fudenberg and D. K. Levine, The theory of learning in games.Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1999.
[2] G. W. Brown, “Iterative solution of games by fictitious play,” in Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. New York: John
Wiley and Sons, 1951, ch. 24.
[3] E. Hopkins, “Two competing models of how people learn in
games,” Econometrica, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 2141–2166, 2002.
[4] I. Erev and A. E. Roth, “Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria,” The American Economic Review, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 848–881, 1998.
[5] R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2012.
[6] W. B. Arthur, “Complexity in economic theory. inductive reasoning and bounded rationality,” American Economic Review, vol. 84, 1994.42 BIBLIOGRAPHY 43
[7] D. Easley and J. Kleinberg, Networks, crowds and markets reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[8] D. Challet, M. Marsili, and G. Ottino, “Shedding light on el farol,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, vol. 332, pp. 469–482, 2004.
[9] R. Franke, “Reinforcement learning in the el farol model,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 51, pp. 367–388, 2003.
[10] D. Whitehead, “The el farol bar problem revisited: Reinforcement learning in a potential game,” in ESE Discussion Papers 186. Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Tech. Rep., 2008.
[11] Y. R. Chao, “A note on “continuous mathematical induction”,” Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 17–18, 1919.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *