本研究是利用「Kraljic model」分析出半導體業晶圓製造的間接物料，最終目標就
是提高獲利並減少供應風險，產學界大多數研究為對不同供應商的評選，對應評估的物
料差異化則相當有限，在詭譎多變的世界，提升企業的採購戰略思考是非常重要的方向。
利用文獻與數學工具，提供一個系統化的物料分析法:首先定義出物料範圍，利用機
會成本界定出有利益的品類，篩選出較有效益的材料後，成立跨組織團隊利用專家共識
法找出適合的Kraljic 維度準則因子，再透過「層級分析法」(Analytic Hierarchy Process ,
AHP)與FAHP 模糊理論找出因子間的權重，畫出管理層也可易於辨識的組合矩陣。本
研究將原物料共三個族群共兩千餘種品類，鎖定最有節餘潛力的前三名間接材料共181
種並畫在Kraljic 組合矩陣內，獲得有效的差異性採購結果：戰略物料共有15 種，戰略
物料共有39 種，非關鍵物料共有32 種，瓶頸物料共有95 種。針對矩陣進行可行性分
析並找出有效策略，利用學者的九種採購差異化策略，提出可執行方案。組合矩陣分析
使半導體的採購部門可以整理出一個物料管理機制，快速找出應當關注之物料品類，予
以改善之。

The purpose of this study is to use the "Kraljic model" to analyze the use of indirect materials
for wafer fabrication in the semiconductor industry. The ultimate goal is to increase profitability
and reduce supply risks. Most of the research in the industry and academia is for the selection
of different suppliers. Material differentiation is quite limited. In the ever-changing world, it is
very important to improve the company's procurement strategy.
Using literature and mathematical tools to provide a systematic material analysis method; first
define the material range, use the opportunity cost to define the categories of interest, select the
more effective materials, and then establish an inter-organizational team to use the expert
consensus method to find out The appropriate Kraljic dimension criterion factor, through the
"Analytic Hierarchy Process" (AHP) and FAHP fuzzy theory to find the weight between the
factors, draw a portfolio matrix that management can also easily identify. In this study, the
original materials have a total of more than 2,000 categories of three ethnic groups, and 181 of
the top three indirect materials with the most potential for savings are drawn and drawn in the
Kraljic portfolio matrix to obtain effective differential procurement results: 15 strategic
materials. There are 39 kinds of strategic materials, 32 kinds of non-critical materials, and 95
kinds of bottleneck materials. A feasibility analysis is carried out for the matrix and an effective
strategy is found. The scholars' nine procurement differentiation strategies are used to propose
an executable solution. The portfolio matrix analysis enables the semiconductor procurement
department to sort out a material management mechanism to quickly identify the types of
materials that should be focused on and improve them.

誌謝---------------------i
中文摘要--------------- -ii
ABSTRACT----------------iii
目錄---------------------iv
圖目錄-------------------vi
表目錄------------------viii
第一章-------------------1
第二章-------------------5
第三章-------------------25
第四章-------------------44
第五章-------------------69
參考文獻-----------------72

1. 王玮. (2017). SMEE 公司的采购策略优化和实践 (Master's thesis, 华东理工大学).
2. 朱惠蘭.(2013).採購要點參考(ASE Group)
3. 何世湧.(2017). 2017 電子材料產業年鑑
4. 邱建智.(2009). 高科技產業採購策略之研析-以半導體產業為例. 成功大學工程管理碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-82.
5. 唐继东.(2015). O 公司间接材料采购成本改善研究 (Master's thesis, 华南理工大学).
6. 张梦岑.(2017).B公司间接物料采购管理研究(Master's thesis,成都理工大学).
7. 張紹勳.(2012). 模糊多準則評估法及統計. 台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
8. 菊池正典.(2016), 半導體工廠，世茂出版有限公司，台灣新北市.
9. 潘斌.(2015). 基于 AHP 的 GW 公司供应商分级分类管理研究 (Doctoral dissertation, 硕士学位论文. 天津: 河北工业大学).
10. 鍾秀瑄.(2016). 校正實驗室評選研究-以半導體封裝測試廠為例. 清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系工程碩士在職專班學位論文, 1-62.
11. Bensaou, M. (1999). Portfolios of buyer-supplier relationships. MIT Sloan Management Review, 40(4), 35.
12. Caniëls, M. C., & Gelderman, C. J. (2005, March). Power and interdependence in Kraljic's purchasing portfolio matrix. In 14th annual IPSERA (International Purchasing and Supply Education and Research Association) conference (pp. 20-24)
13. Caniels, M. C., & Gelderman, C. J. (2005). Purchasing strategies in the Kraljic matrix—A power and dependence perspective. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 11(2-3), 141-155.
14. Caniëls, M. C., & Gelderman, C. J. (2007). Power and interdependence in buyer supplier relationships: A purchasing portfolio approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 219-229.
15. Elliott-Shircore, T. I., & Steele, P. T. (1985). Procurement positioning overview. Purchasing and Supply Management, December, 23, 26.
16. Ferreira, L. M., & Kharlamov, A. A. (2012). Application of Kraljic’s purchasing portfolio matrix in construction industry–A case study. In International Conference of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management.
17. Gangurde, S. R., & Chavan, A. A. (2016). Benchmarking of purchasing practices using Kraljic approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(7), 1751-1779.
18. Gelderman, C. J., & Van Weele, A. J. (2003). Handling measurement issues and strategic directions in Kraljic's purchasing portfolio model. Journal of purchasing and supply management, 9(5-6), 207-216.
19. Gelderman, C. J., & Van Weele, A. J. (2002). Strategic direction through purchasing portfolio management: a case study. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(1),30-37.
20. Hadeler, B. J., & Evans, J. R. (1994). Supply strategy: capturing the value. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT-CHICAGO THEN ATLANTA, 36, 3-3.
21. Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D., & Regnér, P. (2011). Exploring strategy. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
22. Kraljic, Peter. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard business review, 61(5), 109-117.
23. Kamann, D. J. F. (2007). Organizational design in public procurement: A stakeholder approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(2), 127-136.
24. Lee, D. M., & Drake, P. R. (2010). A portfolio model for component purchasing strategy and the case study of two South Korean elevator manufacturers. International Journal of Production Research, 48(22), 6651-6682.
25. Lilliecreutz, J., & Ydreskog, L. (2001). Supplier classification as an enabler for a differentiated purchasing. Best Practice Procurement: Public and Private Sector Perspectives, 73.
26. Olsen, R. F., & Ellram, L. M. (1997). A portfolio approach to supplier relationships. Industrial marketing management, 26(2), 101-113.
27. Jonathan O'brien. (2009). Category management in purchasing: a strategic approach to maximize business profitability. Kogan Page Publishers.
28. Padhi, S. S., Wagner, S. M., & Aggarwal, V. (2012). Positioning of commodities using the Kraljic Portfolio Matrix. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,18(1),1-8.
29. Syson, R. (1992). Improving purchase performance. London: Pitman..
30. Schoeffler, S., Buzzell, R. D., & Heany, D. F. (1974). Impact of strategic planning on profit performance. Harvard Business Review, 52(2)

相關網站
[1]IC Insights, Inc , 2008-2019
http://www.icinsights.com/
[2]經濟部工業局智慧電子產業計畫推動辦公室 (SIPO),2017
https://www.sipo.org.tw/.
[3]中華民國統計資訊網 (National Statistics , R.O.C.)
https://www.stat.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4
[4] 中國知網 (CNKI) , 1998-2019
http://www.cnki.net/