精密組裝製造業中涵蓋電腦資訊裝置、通訊裝置與電子零組件等相關產品，如今這些產品的世代更新相當迅速，產品生命週期短，因此目前組裝製造業仍大量雇用成本相對較低的作業人員完成各種組裝作業。精密組裝作業中，產品的品質與組裝效率將取決於組裝人員在組裝動作上的手部靈巧度。本研究將自行開發平板上的「點擊測驗系統」，並探討此種智慧化的測驗方式是否也能有效評估人員的手部靈巧能力。除此之外，研究中也加入彭竣威（2016）所開發的平板追蹤測驗和傳統工具中已被證實能有效評估手部靈巧度的普渡釘板，並比較這些測驗方法在量測手機精密組裝上的效果差異。
本研究的實驗共分為兩個階段，第一階段為學習能力的探討，此階段招募十位受試者，每位皆以隨機的順序接受四項測驗，分別為手機組裝測驗、普渡釘板測驗、平板追蹤測驗及平板點擊測驗，而每種測驗皆重覆執行十次的操作，之後利用差異性檢定與事後檢定探討受試者在每種測驗中各必須經過幾次的操作後才能完全熟悉測驗動作並體現出真實的手部靈巧能力。此階段的結果顯示，平板點擊測驗與平板追蹤測驗不需要練習，普渡釘板測驗中的右手測驗需要五次練習，左手與雙手測驗不需要練習，組裝測驗需要一次練習，手機組裝測驗需要兩次練習。
第二階段則是相關性的探討，此階段招募另外三十位受試者進行同樣的四項測驗，練習次數則是依據第一階段的結果而定，受試者執行完要求的練習次數後再進行三次的正式測驗，並利用已排除學習效果的正式測驗成績進行Pearson相關性比較。結果顯示，本研究所開發的平板電腦點擊測驗中，點擊失敗次數與點擊失敗率皆與手機組裝表現呈現顯著相關，除此之外，與手機組裝呈現顯著相關的還有普渡釘板右手測驗與左手測驗，這些具相關性的表現數據將能做為精密手機組裝作業的能力評估指標。
整體而言，對於期望能評估組裝人員手部能力的精密組裝業來說，本研究所開發的平板電腦點擊測驗將是非常具有潛力的量測工具，除了評估效果與普渡釘板同樣優異之外，測量效率也比傳統工具來得更有效率。

Products for the computer, communication, and consumer electronics industry have a short life cycle and tend to change frequently. As such, production lines often need to change and thus still rely on workers for many assembly tasks. Thus, hand dexterity is an important consideration that affects productivity. In this research, we developed a tapping system on a tablet and investigated whether the system can adequately assess hand dexterity. We also compared the assessment efficiency of this tapping system with the tracing system by Peng (2016) and the Purdue Pegboard Test.
There were two stages to this research. Phase one examined the learning effect on the Tracing Test, Tapping Test, Purdue Pegboard Test, and the phone assembly task. Stage one included 10 participants that were randomly assigned to different orders of the four tests. The subject performed ten repetitive tests. Then we analyzed each test for significance in differences. A post hoc test was also utilized to eliminate the learning effect and to assess the real hand performance of the subjects.
The results indicated that the Tapping Test and Tracing Test do not require any practice. The Purdue Pegboard Test needed five practice sessions for the right hand and one practice session for the assembly. Meanwhile, the left hand and both hands did not. The phone assembly task needs two practice runs.
In phase two, we investigated correlation for the four tests and recruited another 30 participants. The practice times of each test were determined based on the results of stage one. After practice sessions, subjects performed formal tests three times and we used these performance scores to run a Pearson correlation test. The results indicated that the fail times and fail rate of the Tapping Test had a significant correlation with phone assembly. For the Purdue Pegboard Test – Right hand and Purdue Pegboard Test – Left hand, there was also a significant correlation with the phone assembly. Thus, these performance factors were used as the standard to evaluate the efficiency of the precision phone assembly task.
In conclusion, the Tapping Test is a tool with good potential to evaluate worker hand dexterity for the precision assembly industry. The assessment is on par with the Purdue Pegboard Test. Additionally, the Tapping Test is also more efficient than traditional tools.

摘要 i
Abstract iii
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.1.1台灣產業背景 1
1.1.2精密電子工業的重要性與電子產品的未來性 3
1.1.3電子製造業保持競爭力的決策分析 4
1.2研究目的 5
第二章 參考文獻 6
2.1人力組裝之重要能力 6
2.2 傳統測量方法與其應用 6
2.3 本研究開發測驗之參考依據 8
2.4手部靈巧測驗之電子化運用 9
第三章 研究方法 11
3.1程式開發 11
3.2研究材料 18
3.2.1平板電腦點擊測驗 18
3.2.2平板電腦追蹤測驗 19
3.2.3手機組裝測驗 20
3.2.4普渡釘板測驗 23
3.3實驗設計與步驟 25
3.3.1研究參與者 26
3.3.2實驗設計 27
3.4數據處理與分析手法 35
3.5實驗假設 38
第四章 結果 40
4.1慣用手量表之結果 40
4.2第一階段實驗之分析結果 40
4.2.1平板電腦點擊測驗之分析結果 41
4.2.2平板電腦追蹤測驗之分析結果 43
4.2.3手機組裝測驗之分析結果 43
4.2.4普渡釘板測驗之分析結果 45
4.3第二階段實驗之分析結果 49
4.3.1同質性檢定 50
4.3.2單因子變異數分析 50
4.3.3 Pearson相關性分析 51
第五章 討論 54
5.1第一階段實驗 54
5.2第二階段實驗 56
5.2.1單因子變異數分析 57
5.2.2相關性分析 57
第六章 結論 62
6.1研究貢獻 62
6.2未來展望 62
參考文獻 64
附錄一、研究倫理審查委員會之核可證明 68
附錄二、愛丁堡慣用手量表 69
附錄三、完整的手機組裝測驗之Dunnett’s T3事後檢定表 70
附錄四、完整的普渡釘板右手測驗之LSD事後檢定表 73
附錄五、完整的普渡釘板組裝測驗之Dunnett’s T3事後檢定表 76

中華民國‧台閩地區-工廠校正暨營運調查報告, 經濟部統計處, http://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/dos/content/ContentLink.aspx?menu_id=9427
呂慧君. (2008). 慣用手, 健康狀況及情緒狀態之相關性研究. 臺灣大學分子醫學研究所學位論文, 1-124.
我國主要出口貨品, 經濟統計指標, 經濟部統計處, http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/content/ContentLink.aspx?menu_id=7710
我國外銷訂單--按國家、貨品別, 經濟統計指標, 經濟部統計處, http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/content/ContentLink.aspx?menu_id=7710
汪芷如. (2014). 左撇子學童以右手寫書法之歷程與可行性研究. 國立臺中教育大學美術學系研究所學位論文, 1-133.
邱皓政. (2010). 量化硏究與統計分析: SPSS (PASW) 資料分析範例. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
張家銘, & 蔡智能. (2003). 老年人之周全性評估. 臺灣醫學, 7(3), 364-374.
彭竣威, & 張堅琦. (2016). 生產線工作人員的作業相容性評估測驗. 國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系碩士論文, 1-46.
製造業主要行業生產指數年增率, 經濟統計指標, 經濟部統計處, http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/content/ContentLink.aspx?menu_id=7710
Agar, J. (2013). Constant touch: A global history of the mobile phone. Icon Books Ltd.
Agresti, A., Finlay, B., 鄭宗琳, & 吳宇真. (2002). 社會統計學. 台北: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
Bensel, C. K. (1993). The effects of various thicknesses of chemical protective gloves on manual dexterity. Ergonomics, 36(6), 687-696.
Berger, M. A., Krul, A. J., & Daanen, H. A. (2009). Task specificity of finger dexterity tests. Applied ergonomics, 40(1), 145-147.
Bohnen, N. I., Kuwabara, H., Constantine, G. M., Mathis, C. A., & Moore, R. Y. (2007). Grooved pegboard test as a biomarker of nigrostriatal denervation in Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience letters, 424(3), 185-189.
Brorsson, S., Nilsdotter, A., Pedersen, E., Bremander, A., & Thorstensson, C. (2012). Relationship between finger flexion and extension force in healthy women and women with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 44(7), 605-608.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. (2014). Occupational outlook handbook, 2014–2015 edition: Geoscientists.
Byrd, A. P., Stone, R. T., & Anderson, R. G. Dexterity: An Indicator of Future Performance in Beginning Welders?. In Western AAAE Research Conference Proceedings 2014 (p. 136).
Chapman, R. L. (1948). The MacQuarrie test for mechanical ability. Psychometrika, 13(3), 175-179.
Corey, D. M., Hurley, M. M., & Foundas, A. L. (2001). Right and left handedness defined: a multivariate approach using hand preference and hand performance measures. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 14(3), 144-152.
Corp, I. B. M. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0.
Culmer, P. R., Levesley, M. C., Mon-Williams, M., & Williams, J. H. (2009). A new tool for assessing human movement: the kinematic assessment tool. Journal of neuroscience methods, 184(1), 184-192.
Dunnett, C. W. (1980). Pairwise multiple comparisons in the unequal variance case. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(372), 796-800.
Fleishman, E. A., & Ellison, G. D. (1962). A factor analysis of fine manipulative tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46(2), 96.
Fleishman, E. A., & Hempel, W. E. (1954). A factor analysis of dexterity tests. Personnel Psychology, 7(1), 15-32.
Gauvin, C., Tellier, C., Daigle, R., & Petitjean-Roget, T. (2006, May). Evaluation of dexterity tests for gloves. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Protective Clothing and Nokobetef, 8, 10-12.
Goodman, C. H. (1947). The MacQuarrie Test for Mechanical Ability: II. Factor analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 31(2), 150.
Johnson, R. F., & Sleeper, L. A. (1986, September). Effects of chemical protective handwear and headgear on manual dexterity. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 30(10), 994-997.
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621.
Lee, K., Junghans, B. M., Ryan, M., Khuu, S., & Suttle, C. M. (2014). Development of a novel approach to the assessment of eye–hand coordination. Journal of neuroscience methods, 228, 50-56.
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. Contributions to probability and statistics, 1, 278-292.
Mak, M. K. Y., Lau, E. T. L., Tam, V. W. K., Woo, C. W. Y., & Yuen, S. K. Y. (2015). Use of Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test in evaluating the hand dexterity in people with Parkinson's disease. Journal of Hand Therapy, 28(4), 389-395.
Mathis, R. L., Jackson, J. H., & Valentine, S. R. (2013). Human resource management. Cincinnati OH: South-Western College Pub.
Nelson, J. B., & Mital, A. (1995). An ergonomic evaluation of dexterity and tactility with increase in examination/surgical glove thickness. Ergonomics, 38(4), 723-733.
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113.
Pitchford, N. J., & Outhwaite, L. A. (2016). Can touch screen tablets be used to assess cognitive and motor skills in early years primary school children? A cross-cultural study. Frontiers in psychology, 7.
Robinette, K. M., Ervin, C., & Zehner, G. (1987). Development of a standard dexterity test battery. Anthropology Research Project Inc Yellow Springs OH.
Roy, R. (2015). Consumer Product Innovation and Sustainable Design: the evolution and impacts of successful products. Routledge.
Růžička, E., Krupička, R., Zárubová, K., Rusz, J., Jech, R., & Szabó, Z. (2016). Tests of manual dexterity and speed in Parkinson’s disease: Not all measure the same. Parkinsonism & related disorders, 28, 118-123.
Sawyer, J. O., & Bennett, A. (2006). Comparing the level of dexterity offered by latex and nitrile SafeSkin gloves. Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 50(3), 289-296.
Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3-4), 591-611.
Short, N., Harmsen, R., Kjellgren, G., O'neill, C., Pinney, H., Rivera, A. D., & Warnaar, V. (2017). Use of Dexteria application to improve fine motor coordination in the nondominant hand. Journal of Hand Therapy, 30(1), 106-108.
Statistics, L. (2013). Kruskal-Wallis H test using SPSS statistics. Lund Research Ltd.
TI, I. "The MacQuarrie test for mechanical ability." (1927).
Tiffin, J. (1968). Purdue pegboard examiner manual. Science Research Associates.
Tiffin, J., & Asher, E. J. (1948). The Purdue Pegboard: norms and studies of reliability and validity. Journal of applied psychology, 32(3), 234.
Tissue, C. M., Velleman, P. F., Stegink-Jansen, C. W., Aaron, D. H., Winthrop, B. G., & Gogola, G. R. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Functional Dexterity Test in children. Journal of Hand Therapy.
Waters, R. L., Sie, I. H., Gellman, H., & Tognella, M. (1996). Functional hand surgery following tetraplegia. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 77(1), 86-94.
Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization ofstudent's' problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34(1/2), 28-35.
Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach. Biometrika, 38(3/4), 330-336.
Yancosek, K. E., & Howell, D. (2009). A narrative review of dexterity assessments. Journal of Hand Therapy, 22(3), 258-270.
Yokoe, M., Okuno, R., Hamasaki, T., Kurachi, Y., Akazawa, K., & Sakoda, S. (2009). Opening velocity, a novel parameter, for finger tapping test in patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 15(6), 440-444.