|
一、中文文獻 易正明(2004)。有趣的數學活動。國教輔導,44(1),14- 20。 郭文金、梁惠珍、柳賢(2015)。數學動手做活動對六七年級女學生數學學習自 我效能影響之初探。屏東大學科學教育,1,54-82。 劉伊祝(2007)。 從認知發展理論淺談小五因數與倍數單元之學習策略。國教之 友,60(1),54-59。 黃國勳、劉祥通(2002)。歡樂滿堂的數學課-因數教材創新教學之實踐。科學 教育研究與發展季刊,26,52-64。 劉祥通、黃國勳(2003)。實踐小學因數教學模組之研究。科學教育學刊, 11(3),235-256。 劉祥通、周立勳(1999)。國小比例問題教學實踐課程之開發研究。中師數理學 報,3(1),1-25。 黃國勳、劉祥通(2003)。國小五年級學童學習因數教材困難之探討。科學教育 研究與發展季刊,30,52-70。 教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學習領域。台北市:教育部。 二、外文文獻 Akhtar, M., & Saeed, M. (2017). Applying activity based learning (ABL) in improving quality of teaching at secondary school level. PJERE, 2(2), 37-47. Al-Shammari, Z., Al-Sharoufi, H., & Yawkey, T, D. (2008). The effectiveness of direct instruction in teaching english in elementary public education schools in kuwait: A research case study. Education, 129(1), 80-90. Bonwell, C, C. (2000). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Retrieved from https://www.asec.purdue.edu/lct/hbcu/documents/active_learning _creating_excitement_in_the_classroom.pdf Betts, B., & Liow, S, R. (2006). The relationship between teaching methods and educational objectives in building education. Construction Management and Economics, 11(2), 131-141. Belenky, D, M., & Nokes-Malach, T, J. (2012). Motivation and transfer: The role of mastery-approach goals in preparation for future learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(3), 399-432. Collins, A. (2012). What is the most effective way to teach problem solving?A commentary on productive failure as a method of teaching. Instructional Science, 40(4), 731–735. Cernusca, D., & Mallik, S. (2018). Making failure productive in an active learning context:Improved student performance and perceptions in a pharmaceutics chemistry course. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 19(2), 37–49. DeCaro, M, S., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2012). Exploring mathematics problems prepares children to learn from instruction. Journal of Experimental Child ‘ Psychology, 113(4), 552–568. Fallon, E., Walsh, S., & Prendergast, T. (2013). An activity-based approach to the learning and teaching of research methods: Measuring student engagement and Learning. Irish Journal of Academic Practice, 2(1), 1-24. Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1984). Direct instruction mathematics: A longitudinal evaluation of low-income elementary school students. The Elementary School Journal, 84(4), 395-407. Gleason, B, L., Peeters, M, J., Resman-Targoff, B, H., Karr, S., Mcbane, S., Kelley, K., Thomas, T., & Denetclaw, T, H. (2011). An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(9), 1-12. Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553. Hammer, J., & Black, J. (2009). Games and(preparation for future)learning. Educational Technology, 49(2), 29-34. Harfield, T., Davies, K., Hede, J., Panko, M., & Kenley, R. (2007). Activity- based teaching for unitec new zealand construction students. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 12(1), 57-63. Halpern, R. (2016). Active learning works! Until it doesn't: Measuring the effectiveness of activity-based learning exercises on information anxiety. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 10(3-4), 242- 253. Kolb, D, A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45-83. Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science, 38(5), 1008–1022. Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities. Instructional Science, 40(4), 645–650. Kapur, M. (2011). A further study of productive failure in mathematical problem solving:Unpacking the design components. Instructional Science, 39(4), 561– 579. Kapur, M., & Knzer, C, K. (2009). Productive failure in CSCL groups.Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 21-46. Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15(10), 661–667. Kirschner, P, A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R, E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. Mylopoulos, M., Brydges, R., Woods, N, N., Manzone, J., & Schwartz, D, L. (2016). Preparation for future learning: a missing competency in health professions education? Medical Education, 50(1), 115–123. Mayer, R, E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14-19. Petress, K. (2008). What is meant by "active learning?''. Education, 128(4), 566-569. Pang, K. (2010). Creating stimulating learning and thinking using new models of activity-based learning and metacognitive-based activities. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 7(4), 29-38. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. Ravi, R., & Xavier, P. (2007). Activity based learning as self-accessing strategy to promote learners' autonomy. Journal on Educational Psychology, 1(2), 7-9. Reese, D, D. (2007). First steps and beyond:Serious games as preparation for future learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 16(3), 283-300. Sivertsen, M, L. (1993). Transforming ideas for teaching and learning science:A guide for elementary science education. Washington, DC: Office of Research. Song, Y., & Kapur, M. (2017). How to flip the classroom - productive failure or traditional flipped classroom pedagogical design? Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 292–305. Song, Y. (2018). Improving primary students’ collaborative problem solving competency in project-based science learning with productive failure instructional design in a seamless learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(4), 979–1008. Siler, S, A., Klahr, D., & Price, N. (2013). Investigating the mechanisms of learning from a constrained preparationfor future learning activity. Instructional Science, 41(1), 191–216. Schwartz, D, L., & Bransford, J, D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 475-522. Schwartz, D, L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student roduction in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129-184. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 351-362. Tuovinen, J, E., & Sweller, J. (1999). A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 334-341. Watson, W, A. (2010). Middle school students’ experiences on a science museum field trip as preparation for future learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). George Washington University, Washington.
|