帳號:guest(18.119.122.106)          離開系統
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者查詢臺灣博碩士論文系統以作者查詢全國書目
作者(中文):林貞均
作者(外文):Lin, Jen-Jiun
論文名稱(中文):行動科技輔助第二外語字彙學習成效之後設量化分析研究
論文名稱(外文):The Effects of Mobile-Assisted Second Language Vocabulary Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Research
指導教授(中文):林惠芬
指導教授(外文):Lin, Hui-Fen
口試委員(中文):劉顯親
黃虹慈
口試委員(外文):Liou, Hsien-Chin
Huang, Hung-Tzu
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立清華大學
系所名稱:外國語文學系
學號:102042601
出版年(民國):106
畢業學年度:106
語文別:英文
論文頁數:156
中文關鍵詞:後設分析行動科技輔助第二外語字彙習得簡訊服務多媒體訊息服務行動應用學習軟體第二外語字彙
外文關鍵詞:Meta-analysisMALLSMSMMSAppsVocabulary
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:99
  • 評分評分:*****
  • 下載下載:26
  • 收藏收藏:0
近年來,行動科技輔助外語學習 (Mobile-assisted Language Learning) 由於被認為能夠提供學習者一種更貼近外語學習的真實語境、加強社交連結、偵測學習者的外在情境,提供符合情境的學習內容,並且提供具個人化的行動輔助語言學習環境,因此在第二外語習得的領域中,引起廣泛的討論與關注。研究者們使用不同的學習策略來檢視行動學習對第二外語字彙記憶的效果,並且提出一些在學習上的優勢以及可能的限制。在目前的行動科技輔助第二外語字彙習得的研究上,根據情境學習理論、外語字彙記憶的認知機制、行為主義和社會建構等理論所支持的簡訊服務(Short Message Service)、多媒體訊息服務(Multimedia Message Service)、和行動學習應用軟體(mobile applications)成為被運用來促進行動輔助學習第二外語字彙的主要方式。儘管行動輔助字彙學習吸引許多教育者關注,然而,對於行動科技輔助第二外語字彙習得的效益,在實證的研究結果上,仍然未能獲得一致性的共識。並且,目前尚未發現針對第二外語字彙學習效果量,進行系統性檢視的量化後設分析研究。
因此,本研究欲藉由量化的後設分析研究,系統性檢視從2005到2015間,29篇符合篩選條件的研究,以瞭解是否行動科技學習與第二外語字彙習得兩者之間有所關聯。後設分析結果發現,行動學習對於輔助第二外語字彙習得的影響上,整體呈現出具有正向並且效果量大的顯著效果,證實行動學習確實能提升第二外語字彙的學習成效。此外,簡訊服務(SMS)與多媒體訊息服務(MMS)模式比起行動應用軟體模式(APPs)在提升第二外語字彙學習的成效上,有更為顯著的幫助。然而,這樣的發現應該被視為一種暫時性的結果,因為賦予SMS與MMS兩種學習模式的單字量和記憶時間並不相等。研究進行的場域,研究實施時間,學習者的自主控制性,以及測驗方式經比較分析後發現,對於行動輔助第二外語字彙的成效上,皆有顯著性的影響。此外,由於本研究中發現一些研究有設計不良之處以及部分類別的變項之研究數量偏少,故上述的研究結果,僅為具有建議性而非決定性的研究發現。
Recently, Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) has been popular in SLA field since it has been considered able to facilitate language learning in a more authentic, socially connective, contextually sensitive and personalized mobile mediated language learning environments. Researchers have employed various strategies to examine the advantages and possible limitations of mobile L2 word retention. Among the current mobile L2 vocabulary learning research, Short Message Services (SMS), Multimedia Message Service (MMS) and mobile applications (APPs) are predominant approaches supported by Situated learning theory (Brown et al, 1989), cognitive mechanisms to L2 word retention (Sweller et al, 1998; Nation, 2001; Schmidt, 1990; Paivio, 1991), Behaviorism (Skinner, 1968) and Social Constructivism (Lev Vygotsky, 1978). Despite its seeming appeal to language educators, literature on the effectiveness of mobile L2 vocabulary learning still remained inconclusive. Besides, to date, little research synthesis has been conducted to investigate the effect of mobile-assisted L2 vocabulary learning.
Thus, this meta-analysis aims to systematically synthesize findings from (quasi-) experimental studies conducted between 2005 and 2015 to examine whether there was a connection between the use of mobile technologies and L2 word retention. Results from 29 primary eligible studies showed a positive and large effect from mobile-assisted L2 word learning interventions. Additionally, SMS/MMS mode was found to be more beneficial for L2 word retention than mobile applications (APPs) modes; however, this result should be interpreted as tentative since the number of target words and time were unequal between two modes. Moreover, research settings, treatment durations, learner autonomy, and outcome measurements were found to be variables that would significantly moderate the effectiveness of mobile-assisted L2 word retention. The above results, however, should be viewed as suggestive but definitive due to research flaws found in the primary studies and the small sample size of some categories of moderators under comparison.
摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF TABLES vii
LIST OF FIGURES viii
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Motivation and Background 1
The Theoretical Frameworks Related to Mobile L2 Vocabulary Learning 3
Strands of Mobile L2 Vocabulary Research 3
Research Syntheses: Quantitative Meta-analyses 6
1.2 Statement of Problems 7
1.3 Purposes of the Study 8
1.4 Research Questions 9
1.5 Significance of the Study 9
1.6 Definition of Terms 10
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 13
2.1 Research Syntheses: Quantitative Meta-analyses 13
Quantitative Meta-analysis 14
Qualitative Meta-analysis 14
The Process and Learning Strategies of L2 Vocabulary Acquisition 15
Summary 16
2.2 The L2 Vocabulary Learning 17
The L2 Vocabulary Acquisition and Definition of Knowing a Word 17
Implicit Versus Explicit Vocabulary Learning Approaches 18
The Process and Learning Strategies of L2 Vocabulary Acquisition 19
Summary 20
2.3 Mobile-assisted Language Learning (MALL) 23
The Features of Mobile-assisted Language Learning 23
The Rebuttals of Mobile-assisted language learning 25
Main Approaches of Mobile L2 Vocabulary Learning 27
SMS/MMS Approaches 27
Mobile Learning Applications (APPs) 29
Principles for MALL evaluation and design 31
Task-afforded Autonomy and mobile-assisted language learning 33
Summary 35
2.4 The Theoretical Frameworks for Mobile L2 Vocabulary Learning 36
Situated Learning Theory and Mobile Vocabulary Learning 37
The Benefit of Cognitive Mechanisms to Words Retention 37
Cognitive Load Theory 37
Spacing Effect 38
Noticing Hypothesis 38
Dual-Coding Theory 39
From Mobile Behaviorist Learning to Constructivist Learning Theory 40
Constructivist Learning Theory 40
Summary 41
2.5 Empirical Research of Mobile ESL/ EFL Vocabulary Learning 42
Effectiveness of SMS research on L2 Vocabulary 42
Significant Results of SMS on L2 Vocabulary 43
Non-Significant Results of SMS on L2 Vocabulary 45
Effectiveness of MMS Research on L2 Vocabulary 46
Effectiveness of Mobile Applications (APPs) on L2 Vocabulary 47
Summary 52
2.6 Research Syntheses on Mobile L2 Vocabulary Learning 53
Summary 57
2.7 Summary of Chapter Two 57
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 59
3.1 The Problem Formulation 59
3.2 The Data Collection 60
3.3 Literature Searching 60
3.4 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria 64
3.5 The Data Evaluation 65
3.6 Categorizing the Retrieved 29 Studies 65
3.7 Study-level Coding 66
3.8 The Effect Size Calculation 67
3.9 Analysis and Interpretation 72
3.10 Moderator Analysis 74
3.11 Public Presentation 76
3.12 Summary of Chapter Three 78

CHAPTER FOUR RESULT 79
4.1 Overview of Eligible Studies 79
4.2 The Quantitative Meta-analysis 83
4.3 The Examination of Publication Bias 92
4.4 Summary of Chapter Four 94
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 95
5.1 Summary of Research Findings 95
5.2 Conclusion 112
5.3 Pedagogical Implications 114
5.4 Limitations of This Study 117
5.5 Suggestion for Future Research 117
REFERENCE 131
Appendices
Appendix A Study- Level Coding Manual for Total 29 Studies 122
Appendix B Study- Level Coding Sheet for Total 29 Studies 124
Appendix C Study-level Coding of All 29 Studies 125
Appendix D Effect Size Level Coding Manual 130

LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1 Brief Summary of 29 Eligible Quantitative Studies for Meta-analysis 69
Table 4.1 Learners Characteristic of Included Studies 81
Table 4.2 Methodology Characteristics of the Included Studies 82
Table 4.3 Effect Sizes for Each Included Study 84
Table 4.4 Effects of Mobile Vocabulary Learning by Independent Variable 86
Table 4.5 Comparison of Two Meta-analysis Models 87
Table 4.6 Moderator Analysis Results 91
Table 4.7 Follow-up Pairwise Comparisons of Significant Moderators 91
Figure 4.1 Percentage of Publication Type 80
Figure 4.2 Publication Year of Eligible Studies 80
Figure 4.3 Publication Bias: Funnel Plot of Precision by Standard Difference in Mean 93

Ablard, K. & Lipschultz, R. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving
students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 (2): 94-101.

Agca, R. K., & Özdemir, S. (2013). Foreign language vocabulary learning with
mobile technologies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 781-785.

Aitchison, J. (2012). Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. John
Wiley & Sons.

Alanen, R. (1995) Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language
acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and Awareness in Second Language Learning (Technical Report #9) (pp. 259-302). Honolulu, Hawai'i: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.

Alemi, M., Sarab, M., & Lari, Z. (2012). Successful learning of academic word list
via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies, 5(6), 99–109.

Amiryousefi, M., & Ketabi, S. (2011). Mnemonic instruction: A way to boost
vocabulary learning and recall. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(1), 178-182.

Anaraki, F. B. (2009, January). A flash-based mobile learning system for learning
English as second language. In Computer Engineering and Technology, 2009. ICCET'09. International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 400-404). IEEE.

Arievitch, I. M. (2007). An activity theory perspective on educational technology and
learning. In D. W. Kritt & L. T. Winegar (Eds.), Education and technology, critical perspective, possible futures (pp. 49–72). Plymouth: Lexington Books.

Arikan, Y. D., & Ozen, S. O. (2015). A Learning Environment for English Vocabulary
Using Quick Response Codes. Educational Sciences: Theory And Practice, 15(2), 539-551


Atkinson, R. C., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and
its control processes. In K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.

Ausubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York, NY:
Grune & Stratton.

Basoglu, E. B., & Akdemir, O. (2010). A Comparison of Undergraduate Students'
English Vocabulary Learning: Using Mobile Phones and Flash Cards. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(3), 1-7.

BBC Bitesize (2003). Bitesize User Testing, BBC Schools internal report (sourced
from Andrew Lees at BBC Schools)

Beaudin, J. S., Intille, S. S., Tapia, E. M., Rockinson, R., & Morris, M. E. (2007,
November). Context-sensitive microlearning of foreign language vocabulary on a mobile device. In European Conference on Ambient Intelligence (pp. 55-72). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning.
London: Longman

Bloom, K. C., & Shuell, T. J. (1981). Effects of massed and distributed practice on the
learning and retention of second-language vocabulary. The Journal of Educational Research, 74(4), 245-248.

Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic
introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Research synthesis methods, 1(2), 97-111.

Bremner, S. (1998). Language learning strategies and language proficiency:
Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55 (4), 490-513.

Brown, E. (2001). Mobile learning explorations at the Stanford Learning Lab.
Speaking of Computers, 55, 112-120.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of
learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.

Brown, L. (2008). Using mobile learning to teach reading to ninth-grade students
(Order No. 3330949). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I.

Brown, T. S., & Perry, F. L. (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL
vocabulary acquisition. Tesol Quarterly, 25(4), 655-670.

Browne, C., & Culligan, B. (2008). Combining technology and IRT testing to build
student knowledge of high frequency vocabulary. The JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 3-16.

Burston, J. (2014). MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language
Learning, 27(4), 344-357.

Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis
of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(01), 4-20. Vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (4), 655-670. Vocabulary learning and recall. Journal of language teaching and research, vol. 2(1), pp. 178-182.

Candy, P. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning; a comprehensive guide to theory
and practice. Jossey-Bass: CA.

Cavus, N., & Ibrahim, D. (2009). m‐Learning: An experiment in using SMS to
support learning new English language words. British journal of educational technology, 40(1), 78-91.

Chang, C-K., & Hsu, C-K. (2011). A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative
translation-annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 155-180.

Channell, J. (1981). Applying semantic theory to vocabulary teaching. ELT Journal
35: 115-122.

Channell, J. (1988). Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary
acquisition. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 83-96). New York: Longman

Chen, C. M., & Chung, C. J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624-645.

Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. L. (2010). Personalized context-aware ubiquitous learning
system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(4), 341-364.

Chen, C. M., Hsu, S. H., Li, Y. L., & Peng, C. J. (2006). Personalized intelligent m-
learning system for supporting effective English learning. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (Vol. 6, pp. 4898-4903). IEEE.

Chen, C. M., & Chung, C. J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning
system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624-645.

Chinnery G.M. (2006) Emerging technologies: going to the MALL (Mobile Assisted Language Learning). Language Learning & Technology 10, 9–16.

Chiu, Y. H. (2013). Computer‐assisted second language vocabulary instruction A
meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), E52-E56.

Chu, L. Y. (2014). An Exploratory Study of Adult English
Learners’ Vocabulary Acquisition through Smartphone-based Listening Practice. Master thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.

Chun, D. (2001) L2 reading on the web: Strategies for accessing information in
hypermedia. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(5): 367–403

Chung, Y. T. (2000). The motivation and language learning strategies of students in
high school: A site study. The Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.284-292). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational
psychology review, 3(3), 149-210.

Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology
Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29

Coady, J. (1997). L2 vocabulary acquisition: A synthesis of the research. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.),Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp. 273-290). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Collentine, K. (2009). Learner use of holistic language units in multimodal task-based
synchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning &; Technology, 13(2), 68-87.

Cook, V. (2008). Second language learning and language teaching (4th ed.). London: Hodder Education.

Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing research: A guide for literature review (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cooper, H. H., & Hedges, Y. LV (1994 a). The handbook of research synthesis. New
York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994b). Research synthesis as a scientific enterprise. In
H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 3-14). NY: Rusell Sage Foundation.

Cooper, H. M. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach
(4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V., &; Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research
synthesis and meta-analysis: SAGE.

Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of
research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.

Corno, L. & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in class
room learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 88-108.

Coulombe, S., & Grassel, G. (2004). Multimedia adaptation for the multimedia
messaging service. IEEE Communications Magazine, 42(7), 120-126.

Coxhead, A. (2006). Essentials of teaching academic vocabulary: Cengage learningEnglish for academic success (P. Byrd, J. Reid, & C. Schuemann, Eds.). Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning.

Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 11(6), 671-684.

Darmi, R., & Albion, P. (2014). A Review of Integrating Mobile Phones for Language
Learning. International Association for Development of the Information Society.

de la Fuente, M. J. (2014). Learners' attention to input during focus on form listening
tasks: the role of mobile technology in the second language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 261-276.

Dempster F.N. (1987) Effects of variable encoding and spaced presentations on
vocabulary learning. Educational Psychology 79, 162–170.

Derakhshan, A., & Kaivanpanah, S. (2011). The Impact of text-messaging on EFL
freshmen's vocabulary learning. European Association for Computer Assisted
Language Learning, 39.

Dey, A.K. (2000). Providing architectural support for building context-aware
applications. PhD Thesis. Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.

Dornyei, Z., MacIntryre, P. D., & Henry, A. (2015). Motivational dynamics in
language learning. Bristol, Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.

Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). The scope of inquiry and goals of SLA. The
handbook of second language acquisition, 3-15.

Duman, G., Orhon, G., & Gedik, N. (2015). Research trends in mobile assisted
language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL, 27(02), 197-216.

Dunn, R. S. & Dunn, K. J. (1979, January). Learning styles/teaching styles: Should
they…can they…be matched? Educational leadership: Journal of the association
for supervision and curriculum development, vol. 36(4), pp. 238-244.

Elias, T. (2011). Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning. The
International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 143-
156.

Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., and Faloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill.
Science, 208, 1181–1182.

Felder, R. M. & Henriques, E. R. (1995). Learning and teaching styles in foreign and
second language education. Foreign language annals, vol. 28(1), pp. 21-31.

Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in
two decades of research? ReCALL, 20, 141-161.

Fisher, T., Pemberton, R., Sharples, M., Ogata, H., Uosaki, N., Edmonds, P. &
Tschorn, P. (2009). Mobile learning of vocabulary from reading novels: a
comparison of three modes. In Proceedings of 8th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, Orlando, Florida (pp. 191-194)

Fraser C.A. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through
reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 225-241.

Gairns, R., & Redman, S. (1986). Working with words-A guide to teaching & learning
vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gilakjani, A. P. (2012, February). Visual, auditory, kinaesthetic learning styles and
their impacts on English language teaching. Journal of studies in education, vol. 2(1), pp. 104-113.

Gjedde, L., & Bo-Kristensen, M. (2012). Chapter nine workplace mobile-assisted
second language learning: designing for learner centered generated authenticity. Left to my own Devices: Learner Autonomy and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Learner Autonomy and Mobile-assisted Language Learning, 6, 183.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies
for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational
researcher, 5(10), 3-8.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language
learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2-11.

Goh, T., & Hooper, V. (2007). To TxT or not to TxT: That's the puzzle. Journal of
Information Technology Education, 6, 441-453.

Grace, P., Blair, G. S., & Samuel, S. (2003, November). ReMMoC: A reflective
middleware to support mobile client interoperability. In OTM Confederated International Conferences" On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems" (pp. 1170-1187). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Graves, M. F. (2008). Instruction on individual words: One size does not fit all. In A.
E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), what research has to say about vocabulary instruction (pp.56-79).Newark: DE: International Reading Association

Greene R.L. (1989) Spacing effects in memory: evidence for a two-process account.
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15, 371–377.

Griffin, G. F. , & Harley, T. A. (1996). List learning of second language vocabulary.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 443–460.

Halvorsen, K. T. (1994). The reporting format. In H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 425-438). NY: Rusell Sage Foundation.

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item
response theory. Newburry Park, CA: SAGE.

Handley, Z. (2014). Vocabulary CALL for Young ESL/EFL Learners: A Systematic
Review of the Engaging Language Learners through Technology Integration: Theory, Applications, and Outcomes, 299.

Harmer, J. (2004). The practice of English language teaching. UK: Pearson Education
Limited.

Heift, T. (2002). Learner control and error correction in ICALL: Browsers, peekers,
and adamants. Calico Journal, 295-313.

Herrington, A., Herrington, J., & Mantei, J. (2009). Design principles for mobile
learning. University of Wollongong.

Holec, H. (1979). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Council for Cultural
Cooperation, Strasbourg (France).

Hornby, A. S. (1950). The situational approach in language teaching (I). ELT
Journal, 4(4), 98-103.

Hossler, D., & Scalese-Love, P. (1989). Grounded meta-analysis: A guide for research
synthesis. Review of Higher Education, 13 (1), 1-28.

Hsu, C. K., Hwang, G. J., Chang, Y. T., & Chang, C. K. (2013). Effects of Video
Caption Modes on English Listening Comprehension and Vocabulary Acquisition Using Handheld Devices. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 403-414.

Hsu, L., & Lee, S. (2011). Learning tourism English on mobile phones: How does it
work? Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education 10(2), 85-94.

Hsu, P.-Y. (2006). CALL culture and EFL acquisition: A case study of the effects of
using a network based cultural language curriculum on Taiwanese students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University of Pennsylvania. Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA.

Hu, Z. (2013). Emerging vocabulary learning: from a perspective of activities
facilitated by mobile devices. English Language Teaching, 6(5), 44.

Huang, S. H., & Tzeng, C. S. (2000). Learning strategies used by high English
proficiency learners in Taiwan. The Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 367-372). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Huang, W. T. (1999). Integrated vocabulary teaching in a senior high school: an
empirical study. The Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 385-393). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Huckin, Thomas; Coady, James (1999). “Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second
language: a review”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 181-193.

Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning:
A reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In P. Robinson (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 258-287). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement
load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language learning, 51(3), 539-558.

Hulstijn, J. H., Hollander, M., & Greidanus, T. (1996). Incidental vocabulary learning
by advanced foreign language students: The influence of marginal glosses, dictionary use, and reoccurrence of unknown words. The modern language journal, 80(3), 327-339.

Hung, P. H., Hwang, G. J., Su, I. S., & Lin, I. H. (2012). A concept-map integrated
dynamic assessment system for improving ecology observation competences in mobile learning activities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 10-19.

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error
and bias in research findings (2nd eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning
approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(1), 1023-1031.

Hwang, W. Y., & Chen, H. S. (2013). Users’ familiar situational contexts facilitate the
practice of EFL in elementary schools with mobile devices. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 101-125.

Issac, S. & Michael, W. B. (1981). Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego,
CA: EDITS Publisher.

Jarvis, H. A., & Achilleos, M. (2013). From computer assisted language learning
(CALL) to mobile assisted language use. TESL-EJ, 16(4), 1-18.

Jeng, Y. L., Wu, T. T., Huang, Y. M., Tan, Q., & Yang, S. J. (2010). The add-on impact
of mobile applications in learning strategies: A review study. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 3-11.

Jeung, H. J., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual
sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 329-345.

Jie, Z., & Yining, W. (2011). The Empirical Research on Promoting English Listening
and Speaking Teaching through Mobile Technology [J]. Modern Distance Education Research, 3, 015.

Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2008). The 2008 Horizon Report: Australia–
New Zealand Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.

Jonassen, D. (1991). Context is everything. Educational Technology, 31(6), 35–37.
Kadirire, J., & Guy, R. (2009). Mobile learning demystified. The evolution of mobile teaching and learning, 15-56

Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and
redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied cognitive psychology, 13(4), 351-371.

Ke, F. (2009). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools.
Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education, 1, 1-32.

Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile
learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in learning technology, 20.

Keefe, J. & Ferrell, B. (1990). Developing a defensible learning style paradigm.
Educational leadership, vol. 48(2), pp. 57-61.

Kennedy, C., & Levy, M. (2008). L’italiano al telefonino: Using SMS to support
beginners’ language learning. ReCALL Journal, 20(3), 315–330.

Ketamo, H. (2003). An adaptive geometry game for handheld devices. Educational
Technology & Society, 6, 83-95.

Khazaie, S., & Ketabi, S. (2011). Contribution to vocabulary learning via
mobiles. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 174-184.

Kim, H. (2015). Mobile App Design for Individual and Sustainable MALL:
Implications from an Empirical Analysis. World CALL: Sustainability and Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 244.

Kim, H., & Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-
assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 31-57.

Kim, P., Hagashi, T., Carillo, L., Gonzales, I., Makany, T., Lee, B., & Garate, A.
(2011). Socioeconomic strata, mobile technology, and education: A comparative analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 465-486.

Klopfer, E., Squire, K., & Jenkins, H. (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a
window into a virtual simulated world. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2002. Proceedings. IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 95-98). IEEE.

Kondo, M., Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Sakamoto, K., Shimomura, H., & Wada, N.
(2012). Mobile assisted language learning in university EFL courses in Japan: developing attitudes and skills for self-regulated learning. ReCALL, 24, 169-187

Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.

Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional
evidence of the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers.
Psychology Press.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2006). Mobile language learning now and in the future. In P.
Svensson (Ed.), (From vision to practice: Language learning and IT) (pp. 295–310). Sweden: Swedish Net University (N¨ atuniversitetet).

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language
learning? ReCALL, 21(02), 157-165.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Bull, S. (2009). Theory-based support for mobile language
learning: Noticing and recording. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 3, 12-18.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2007). An overview of mobile assisted language
learning: Can mobile devices support collaborative practice in speaking and listening? Retrieved April 6, 2013.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language
learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(03), 271-289.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., Traxler, J., & Pettit, J. (2007). Designed and user-generated
activity in the mobile age. Journal of Learning Design, 2(1), 52-65.

Laufer, B. (1997). What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy: some intralexical
factors that affect the learning of words. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp.140-155). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language
vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 694-716.

Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second
language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied linguistics, 22(1), 1-26.

Laurillard, D. (2007) Pedagogical forms of mobile learning: framing research
questions. In: Pachler, N. (ed.) Mobile learning – towards a research agenda. WLE Centre, Institute of Education, University of London, 153-175.

Lawson, M. J., & Hogben, D. (1998). Learning and recall of foreign-language
vocabulary: Effects of a keyword strategy for immediate and delayed recall. Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 179-194.

Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2005). Learning Italian via mobile SMS. Mobile learning:
A handbook for educators and trainers, 76-83.

Lewis, M. (1997). Pedagogical implications of the lexical approach. In J. Coady, &
Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp.255-270). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Li, M., Ogata, H., Hou, B., Hashimoto, S., Uosaki, N., Liu, Y., & Yano, Y. (2010,
April). Development of adaptive vocabulary learning via mobile phone e-mail. In Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education (WMUTE), 2010 6th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 34-41). IEEE.

Liangpanit, C. (2013). Integrating vocabulary into an English course in the Thai
context for Thai EFL learners: Research to practice. Journal of Education Naresuan University, vol. 15(2), pp. 108-116.

Liaw, S. S., Hatala, M., & Huang, H. M. (2010). Investigating acceptance toward
mobile learning to assist individual knowledge management: Based on activity theory approach. Computers & Education, 54(2), 446-454.

Light, R., & Pillemer, D. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lin, C-C. and Yu, Y-C. (2012) Learning English vocabulary on mobile phones. In:
Colpaert, J., Aerts, A.,Wu, W-C. V. and Chao, Y-C. J. (eds.), The Medium Matters. Proceedings, 15th International CALL Conference. Taichung, Taiwan: Providence University, 416–420.

Lin, H. (2015). A meta-synthesis of empirical research on the effectiveness of
computer-mediated communication (CMC) in SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2), 85-117.

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Liu, C. C., Tao, S. Y., & Nee, J. N. (2008). Bridging the gap between students and
computers: supporting activity awareness for network collaborative learning with GSM network. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(2), 127-137.

Liu, C. Y., & Yu, C. P. (2013). Can Facebook use induce well-being?
Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 16(9), 674-678.

Loucky, J. P. (2005). Combining the benefits of electronic and online dictionaries with
CALL web sites to produce effective and enjoyable vocabulary and language learning lessons. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(5), 389-416.

Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of
computer assisted learning, 24(6), 515-525.

Mayer, R. & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning.
Learning and Instruction, 12, 107-119.

Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on
our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from http://cogprints.org/730/0/miller.html

Miller, N., & Pollock, V. E. (1994). Meta-analytic synthesis for theory development.
In H. Copper & L. V. Hedges, (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-409). New York: Russell Sage Foundation

Mondria, J. A., & Wiersma, B. (2004). Receptive, productive, and receptive+
productive L2 vocabulary learning: What difference does it make. Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing, 15(1), 79-100.

Morgan, B. Q., & Oberdeck, L. M. (1930). Active and passive vocabulary. In E. W.
Bagster-Collins (Ed.), Studies in modern language teaching (pp. 213–221). London: Macmillan.

Motallebzadeh, K., & Ganjali, R. (2011). SMS: Tool for L2 vocabulary retention and
reading comprehension ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1111–1115

Motallebzadeh, K., Beh-Afarin, R., & Daliry Rad, S. (2011). The effect of short
message service on the retention of collocations among Iranian lower intermediate EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1514–1520.

Murphy, P., Bollen, D., & Langdon, C. (2012). Chapter seven mobile technology,
collaborative reading and elaborative feedback. Left to my own Devices: Learner Autonomy and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning: Learner Autonomy and Mobile-assisted Language Learning, 6, 131.

Murray, T., & Arroyo, I. (2002, June). Toward measuring and maintaining the zone of
proximal development in adaptive instructional systems. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 749-758). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G. and Sharples, M. (2004) Literature Review in
Mobile Technologies and Learning. FutureLab Report 11. http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/ documents/lit_reviews/Mobile_Review.pdf

Nation P.& Meara P. (2002)Vocabulary. In An Introduction to Applied Linguistics
(ed. N. Schmitt), pp. 35–54. Arnold, London.

Nation, I. S. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Ernst Klett Sprachen.

Nation, I.S.P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.

Norris, C., Hossain, A., & Soloway, E. (2011). Using smartphones as essential tools
for learning: A call to place schools on the right side of the 21st century. Educational Technology, 51(3), 18-25.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for
language learning and teaching. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3-50). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Norris, J. M.,& Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.

Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation, imagined communities and the language
classroom. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning (pp. 159e171). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Nye, B., Hedges, L. V., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2004). Do minorities experience
larger lasting benefits from small classes? The Journal of Educational Research, 98(2), 94-100.

O’Malley, J., Chamot, A., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper L. & R. Russo. (1985).
Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.

Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2003). How ubiquitous computing can support language
learning. Computer and Information Science, 1-6.

Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004a). Context-aware support for computer-supported
ubiquitous learning. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings. The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 27-34). IEEE

Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004b). Knowledge awareness map for computer-supported
ubiquitous language-learning. In J. Roschelle, T.W. Chan, Kinshuk, S.Yang (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE ‘04) (pp. 19_26). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

Ogata, H., Akamatsu, R., & Yano, Y. (2005). Computer supported ubiquitous learning
environment for vocabulary learning using RFID tags. In Technology enhanced learning (pp. 121-130). Springer US.

Ogata, H., Yin, C., El-Bishouty, M. M., & Yano, Y. (2010). Computer supported
ubiquitous learning environment for vocabulary learning. International Journal of Learning Technology, 5(1), 5-24

Ogata, H., Yin, C., Paredes, R., Saito, N., Yano, Y., Oishi, Y., & Ueda, T. (2006).
Supporting mobile language learning outside classrooms. Paper presented at the conference ICALT 2006, Kerkrade, The Netherlands.

Ono, Y., Ishihara, M., & Yamashiro, M. (2015). Blended Instruction Utilizing Mobile
Tools in English Teaching at Colleges of Technology. Electrical Engineering In Japan,192(2), 1-11.

Orwin, R. G. (1994). Evaluating Coding Decisions. In H. Cooper & L.V. Hedges
(Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 139-162). NY: Rusell Sage Foundation.

Ozcelik, E., Arslan-Ari, I., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Why does signaling enhance
multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements. Computers in human behavior, 26(1), 110-117.

Palalas, A. (2011). Mobile-assisted language learning: Designing for your
students. Second language teaching and learning with technology: views of emergent researchers, 71.

Paredes, R. G., Ogata, H., Saito, N. A., Yin, C., Yno, Y., Oishi, Y., & Ueda, T. (2005,
November). LOCH: supporting informal language learning outside the classroom with handhelds. In IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'05) (pp. 5-pp). IEEE.

Parry, K. (1991). Building a vocabulary through academic reading. TESOL Quarterly,
25 (4), 629-563.

Pavičić Takač, V. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language
acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Petersen, S. A., & Divitini, M. (2005, November). Language learning: from individual
learners to communities. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2005. WMTE 2005. IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 5-pp). IEEE.

Peters, E. (2007). Manipulating L2 learners’ online dictionary use and its effect on L2
word retention. Language Learning & Technology, 11, 36–58.

Peters, E., Hulstijn, J. H., Sercu, L., & Lutjeharms, M. (2009). Learning L2 German
vocabulary through reading: The effect of three enhancement techniques compared. Language learning, 59(1), 113-151.

Pettit, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2007). Going with the grain: Mobile devices in
practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1).

Prichard, C. (2008). Evaluating L2 readers' vocabulary strategies and dictionary use.
Reading in a foreign language, 20(2), 216.

Redd, J. (2011). Supporting vocabulary growth of high school students: An analysis of
the potential of a mobile learning device and gaming app. PhD thesis, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

Reinders, H., & Hubbard, P. (2013). CALL and learner autonomy: Affordances and
constraints. Contemporary computer assisted language learning, 359-375.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching
and applied linguistics. Routledge.

Richek, M. A., Caldwell, J. S., Jennings, J. H. & Lerner, J. W. (1996). Reading
problems: Assessment and teaching strategies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Riconscente, M. M. (2013 July). Results from a controlled study of the iPad fractions
game motion math. Games and Culture, 8, 186-214.

Rivers, D. J. (2009). Utilizing the quick response (QR) code within a Japanese EFL
environment. The Jalt Call Journal, 5(2), 15-28.

Rodriguez, M., & Sadoski, M. (2000). Effects of rote, context, keyword, and
Learning, 50 (2), 385-412.

Rogers, Y., Price, S., Randell, C., Stanton Fraser, D., Weal, M., & Fitzpatrick, G.
(2005). Ubi-learning integrates indoor and outdoor experiences.
Communications of the ACM, 48(1), 55–59.

Ros i Sole´, C., Calic, J., & Neijmann, D. (2010). A social and self-reflective approach
to MALL. ReCALL, 22, 39–52.

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results.
Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.

Rott, S. (1999). The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’
incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, 21, 589-619.

Rubin, J. & Thompson, I. (1994). How to be a more successful language learner:
Toward learner autonomy (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Runyan, J. D., Steenbergh, T. A., Bainbridge, C., Daugherty, D. A., Oke, L., & Fry, B.
N. (2013). A smartphone ecological momentary assessment/intervention “app” for collecting real-time data and promoting self-awareness. PLoS One, 8(8), e71325.

Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence
ased study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1334–1347.

Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & Hoogendoorn, P. (2014). The added value of a gaming
context and intelligent adaptation for a mobile learning application for vocabulary learning. Computers & Education, 76, 119-130.

Saran, M., Seferoglu, G. and Cagiltay, K. (2012) Mobile language learning:
Contribution of multimedia messages via mobile phones in consolidating
vocabulary. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1): 181–190.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error
and bias in research findings. Sage publications.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language
instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.

Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning.
Language teaching research, vol. 12(3), pp. 329-363.

Schnotz, W. (2005). An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In R. E.
Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 49–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schnotz, W., Bannert, M., & Seufert, T. (2002). Towards an integrative view of text
and picture comprehension: Visualization effects on the construction of mental models. In J. Otero, A. Graesser & J. A. Leon (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 385-416), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schnotz,W. (2001). Signs systems, technologies and the acquisition of knowledge. In
J. F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen & A. Biardeau (Eds), Multimedia learning: cognitive
and instructional issues (pp. 9–30). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.

Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005, October). Video
games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappen, 87(02), 104-111.

Sharples, M. (2006). Big issues in mobile learning. In Report of a workshop by the
Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative. Nottingham: LSRI, University of Nottingham.

Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile
age. In R. Andrews, & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The sage handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221e247). London, UK: Sage Publications.


Sharples, M., Taylor, J., Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. In
Proceedings of MLearn 2005 conference 25–28 October, Cape Town, South Africa.

Shen, Z. (2008). The roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in EFL
reading performance. Asian social science, vol. 4(12), pp. 135-137.
Skinner, B. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86-97.

Skinner, B. F. (1968). The Technology of Teaching New York: Appleton-Century-
Crofts. The behavior of the establishment.

Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and
traditional reviews. Educational researcher, 15(9), 5-11.

Smith, P.L., & Ragan, T.J. (2005). Instructional Design (3rd ed) . New York: Merill.

Smith, R. K. (1998). Building vocabulary for college (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton
Mifflin.

Sökmen, A. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. In N.
Schmitt & M. McCarthy. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp.237-257). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Song, Y. (2008). SMS enhanced vocabulary learning for mobile audiences.
nternational Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 2(1), 81–98.

Song, Y., & Fox, R. (2005, November). Integrating m-technology into Web-based
ESL vocabulary learning for working adult learners. In Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 2005. WMTE 2005. IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 5-pp). IEEE.

Stock, W. A. (1994). Systematic Coding for research synthesis. In H. Cooper & L.V.
Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 125-138). NY: Rusell Sage Foundation.

Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile
phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365-383.

Stockwell, G. (2008). Investigating learner preparedness for and usage patterns of
mobile learning. ReCALL, 20(03), 253-270.

Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the
effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95-110.

Stockwell, G., & Hubbard, P. (2013). Some emerging principles for mobile-assisted
language learning. Monterey, CA: The International Research Foundation for English Language Education. Retrieved April, 17, 1-15.

Stoddard, G. D. (1929). An experiment in verbal learning. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 20, 452–457.

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile
devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yang, J. M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for
language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68-84.

Suwantarathip, O., & Orawiwatnakul, W. (2015). Using mobile-assisted Exercises to
support students' vocabulary skill development. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 163.

Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive load during Problem Solving: Effects on learning.
Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.

Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., and Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive
architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.

Sy, B. M. (2003). The language learning styles and strategies of Chinese EFL
students. The Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on English Teaching (pp.521-531). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Tabatabaei, O., & Goojani, A. (2012). The impact of text messaging on vocabulary
learning of Iranian EFL learners. Cross Cultural Communication, 8(2), 47–55.
Takač, V. P. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language acquisition (Vol. 27). Multilingual matters.

Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2001). Learning on the Move: Foreign language
vocabulary via SMS. Ed-Media 2001 Proceedings (pp. 1846–1847). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.

Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2002). M-learning in transit. In P. Lewis (Ed.), The
changing face of CALL (pp. 229–243). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2004). Using mobile phones in education. In Wireless and
Mobile Technologies in Education, 2004. Proceedings. The 2nd IEEE International Workshop on (pp. 3-10). IEEE.

Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in
Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 217–228.

Toogood, S., Pemberton, R. Tsang, E. & Ho, S. (2002). Assessing SALL –how we do it
at HKUST. (Paper presented at the 13th AILA World Congress of Applied Linguistics December 16-21 2002 Singapore.)

Trifanova, A., Knapp, J., Ronchetti, M., & Gamper, J. (2004). Mobile ELDIT:
Challenges in the transitions from an e-learning to an m-learning system. Trento, B Italy: University of Trento.

Ushioda, E. (2012). Motivation: L2 learning as a special case? In S. Mercer, S. Ryan,
& M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning (pp. 58-73). Houndsmill, Basingstoke, Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Vanniarajan, S. (1997). An interactive model of vocabulary acquisition. Applied
Language Learning, 8 (2), 217-235.

Veerman, A. L., Andriessen, J. E. B., &; Kanselaar, G. (2000). Learning through
synchronous electronic discussion. Computers &; Education, 34, 269-290.

Viberg, O., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Systematising the field of mobile assisted
language learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 5(4), 72-90.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Wang, Y.K. (2004). Context awareness and adaptation in mobile learning. The 2nd
IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 154–158).

Waring, R (1997a). A comparison of the receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of
some second language learners. Immaculata [occasional papers of Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama] 1, 53–68.

Waring, R (1997b). A study of receptive and productive learning from word cards.
Studies in Foreign Languages and Literature, 21, 94–114.

Waring, R., & Nation, I. S. P. (2004). Second language reading and incidental
vocabulary learning. Angles on the English speaking world, 4, 97-110.

Weinberg, D. (2009, November/December). Using learning styles for more effective
teaching. The APDT chronicle of the dog, pp. 29-31.

Wesely, P. M. (2012). Learner attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs in language learning.
Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 98e117

Wilkerson, M., Griswold, W., & Simon, B. (2005). Ubiquitous presenter: Increasing
student access and control in a digital lecturing environment. The 36th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 116–120).

Winters, N. (2006). What is mobile learning? In: Sharples, M. (Eds.), Big Issues in
Mobile Learning. Report of a workshop by the Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
Wu, H. Y. (2002). Teaching techniques that keep university students interested in
English learning. The 11th International Symposium on English Teaching, the 4th Pan-Asian Conference (pp. 565-571). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Wu, Q. (2014). Learning ESL Vocabulary with Smartphones. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 143, 302-307.

Wu, Q. p. (2015). Designing a smartphone app to teach English (L2)
vocabulary. Computers & Education, 85170-179.

Xanthou, M. (2010). Current trends in L2 vocabulary learning and instruction: Is
CLIL the right approach? Advances in research on language acquisition and teaching: Selected papers, pp. 459-471.

Yang, N. D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning
strategy use. System, 27, 515-535.

Yin, C., Ogata, H., Yano, Y., & Oishi, Y. (2004). JAPELAS: Supporting Japanese
polite expressions learning using PDA (s) towards ubiquitous learning. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education, 3(1), 33-39.

Yuan, H. C., & Lin, C. Y. (2001). Collocation: A case study of Ming Chuan University
students. The Proceedings of the 18th Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the ROC (pp. 407- 422). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.

Zarei, G. R., Jalilifar, A., & Khazaie, S. (2013). Does It Make a Difference? L2
Vocabulary Learning via Mobile and Conventional Mode. Studies in English Language Teaching, 1(1), 200.

Zhang, H., Song, W., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the Effectiveness of
Vocabulary Learning via Mobile Phones. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(3), 203-214.

Zhang, L.X. & Li X.X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World, 4, 15-23.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *